XOVR vs. GRNY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XOVR (ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF) and GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOVR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the ER30TR Index, while GRNY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs. XOVR is passively managed, while GRNY is actively managed. Over the past year, XOVR returned 12.49% vs 30.94% for GRNY. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

XOVR vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly lower than GRNY's 12.12% return.

XOVR

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: 9.07%
• YTD: 1.54%
• 6M: 0.64%
• 1Y: 12.49%
• 3Y*: 19.65%
• 5Y*: 6.56%
• 10Y*: —

GRNY

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 12.12%
• 6M: 10.16%
• 1Y: 30.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOVR vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF	1.54%	11.83%	1.87%
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	12.12%	24.05%	-1.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XOVR and GRNY is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024	0.86

The correlation between XOVR and GRNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XOVR vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOVR

XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 18
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

GRNY

GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 51
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 48
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOVR vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XOVR	GRNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	1.77	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	2.37	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.30	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	2.67	-2.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	8.16	-7.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XOVR vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is lower than the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOVR and GRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOVR	GRNY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	1.77	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.98	-0.58

Drawdowns

XOVR vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and GRNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOVR	GRNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.28%	-24.18%	-32.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.32%	-11.63%	-12.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.80%	0.00%	-5.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-4.02%	-14.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.95%	3.80%	+7.15%

Volatility

XOVR vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOVR	GRNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	4.28%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.92%	12.71%	+2.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.07%	17.58%	+2.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.16%	23.17%	+2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.88%	23.17%	+3.71%

XOVR vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XOVR and GRNY have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

XOVR vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

Neither XOVR nor GRNY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOVR ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	57.75%	6.31%	0.08%	3.71%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOVR and GRNY in my portfolio?

XOVR and GRNY have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOVR or GRNY?

XOVR has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to GRNY (4.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs GRNY's -24.18%.

Which ETF is better, XOVR or GRNY?

On 1-year performance, GRNY leads with 30.94% vs 12.49% for XOVR. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, GRNY has been the lower-risk option at 4.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOVR or GRNY?

Over the 1-year period, GRNY has performed better with a 30.94% return vs 12.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOVR or GRNY?

XOVR and GRNY have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOVR or GRNY?

XOVR and GRNY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between XOVR and GRNY?

XOVR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRNY is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: EntrepreneurShares and Tidal ETFs.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.