XOVR vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

XOVR vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 31.48% return.

XOVR

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 0.44%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 1Y: 6.22%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 5.73%
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 1.12%
• 6M: 24.74%
• YTD: 31.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOVR vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF	0.94%	-0.74%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	31.48%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between XOVR and GARY is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025	0.65

Return for Risk

XOVR vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOVR

XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 13
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 14
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

GARY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOVR vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOVR	GARY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.54	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	—	—

Drawdowns

XOVR vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOVR	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.28%	-10.28%	-46.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.36%	-4.17%	-2.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.25%	-1.88%	-16.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XOVR	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.53%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.01%	21.79%	+1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.62%	21.79%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.03%	21.79%	+5.24%

XOVR vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOVR vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	57.75%	6.31%	0.08%	3.71%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOVR and GARY in my portfolio?

XOVR and GARY have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XOVR or GARY?

On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOVR or GARY?

XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOVR or GARY?

GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.

What is the main difference between XOVR and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: ERShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.77% for GARY.