XOVR vs. GARY
XOVR (ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XOVR charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.
Performance
XOVR vs. GARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -4.47% return, which is significantly lower than GARY's 28.36% return.
XOVR
- 1D
- 3.44%
- 1M
- -8.38%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- -0.88%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.77%
GARY
- 1D
- 2.13%
- 1M
- -2.21%
- 6M
- 17.11%
- YTD
- 28.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | $604.89K | $386.84K | $304.13K |
| $32.19M | $37.02M | $109.67M |
XOVR vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | -4.47% | -0.74% |
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 28.36% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOVR and GARY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOVR vs. GARY — Risk / Return Rank
XOVR
GARY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XOVR vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOVR | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOVR vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than GARY's maximum drawdown of -12.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and GARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOVR | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.28% | -12.67% | -43.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.32% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -6.45% | -4.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.21% | -2.42% | -15.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.53% | — | — |
Volatility
XOVR vs. GARY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOVR | GARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.84% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.67% | 22.41% | +1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.68% | 22.41% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.03% | 22.41% | +4.62% |
XOVR vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOVR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOVR vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison
XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARY Mango Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 57.75% | 6.31% | 0.08% | 3.71% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOVR and GARY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOVR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOVR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.
GARY has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for XOVR.
They also come from different issuers: ERShares and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XOVR and 0.77% for GARY.
Find the right allocation for XOVR and GARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer