PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOVR vs. COST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOVR vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOVR achieves a -0.89% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 14.24% return.


XOVR

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.78%
YTD
-0.89%
6M
0.05%
1Y
8.89%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*

COST

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
14.24%
6M
11.38%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
22.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOVR vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
-0.89%11.83%33.21%51.89%-41.09%-7.24%50.39%31.72%-5.02%1.54%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.24%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%12.26%

Correlation

The correlation between XOVR and COST is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2017

0.41

The correlation between XOVR and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOVR vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOVR
XOVR Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XOVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
XOVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOVR vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOVRCOSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.00

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

-0.10

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

-0.22

+1.03

XOVR vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOVR Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOVR and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOVR vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOVR drawdown since its inception was -56.28%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOVR and COST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOVRCOSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.28%

-53.39%

-2.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.32%

-15.14%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.23%

-20.74%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.35%

-31.40%

-17.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-10.23%

+2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-13.36%

-5.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.02%

6.67%

+4.35%

Volatility

XOVR vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF (XOVR) has a higher volatility of 8.27% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.44%. This indicates that XOVR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOVRCOSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.27%

7.44%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.23%

14.53%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.11%

18.80%

+2.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.31%

22.72%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

21.95%

+4.98%

Dividends

XOVR vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

XOVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
XOVR
ERShares Entrepreneur Private-Public Crossover ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%57.75%6.31%0.08%3.71%0.08%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOVR and COST have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOVR has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to COST (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOVR dropped -56.28% vs COST's -53.39%.

XOVR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOVR and COST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer