XOUT vs. QUS
XOUT (GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF) and QUS (SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - XOUT tracks the XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index while QUS tracks the MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XOUT returned 10.93%/yr vs 11.08%/yr for QUS. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XOUT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QUS.
Performance
XOUT vs. QUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOUT achieves a -3.24% return, which is significantly lower than QUS's 6.67% return.
XOUT
- 1D
- -2.27%
- 1M
- 9.28%
- YTD
- -3.24%
- 6M
- -4.85%
- 1Y
- 8.51%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.93%
- 10Y*
- —
QUS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 2.68%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 6.93%
- 1Y
- 17.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 11.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.67%
XOUT vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | -3.24% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.32% |
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 6.67% | 14.13% | 18.99% | 21.78% | -14.15% | 26.72% | 12.40% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOUT and QUS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2019 | 0.84 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XOUT and QUS has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XOUT vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOUT
QUS
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
Utilities
-
Technology
XOUT
QUS
Healthcare
XOUT
QUS
Consumer Cyclical
XOUT
QUS
Communication Services
XOUT
QUS
Financial Services
XOUT
QUS
Consumer Defensive
XOUT
QUS
Industrials
XOUT
QUS
Basic Materials
XOUT
QUS
Real Estate
XOUT
QUS
Energy
XOUT
QUS
Utilities
XOUT
-
QUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOUT vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank
XOUT
QUS
XOUT vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOUT | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.37 | 2.59 | -2.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.92 | 11.54 | -10.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOUT | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.95 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.78 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.77 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
XOUT vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOUT drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOUT and QUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOUT | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -33.78% | +2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -6.85% | -16.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -13.94% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -22.30% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -0.50% | -5.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -3.70% | -4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.25% | 1.53% | +7.72% |
Volatility
XOUT vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF (XOUT) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.78%. This indicates that XOUT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOUT | QUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.48% | 1.78% | +5.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.17% | 6.66% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.55% | 9.09% | +10.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.78% | 14.33% | +7.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.23% | 16.42% | +6.81% |
XOUT vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOUT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOUT vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison
XOUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUS SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.49% | 1.57% | 1.68% | 1.27% | 1.73% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 1.86% | 2.07% | 1.48% |
XOUT GraniteShares XOUT U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOUT and QUS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOUT has higher volatility (7.48%) compared to QUS (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOUT dropped -31.29% vs QUS's -33.78%.
On 5-year performance, QUS leads with 11.08% vs 10.93% for XOUT. On fees, QUS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QUS has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 10.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QUS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XOUT.
QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 0.00% for XOUT.
XOUT tracks XOUT U.S. Large Cap Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XOUT and 0.15% for QUS.
QUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOUT and QUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer