PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. PXJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 41.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XOP has outperformed PXJ with an annualized return of 3.69%, while PXJ has yielded a comparatively lower -1.35% annualized return.


XOP

1D
4.17%
1M
0.40%
6M
30.68%
YTD
32.00%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
11.17%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
3.69%

PXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
-6.30%
6M
29.86%
YTD
41.36%
1Y
62.95%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
20.43%
10Y*
-1.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
32.00%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
41.36%8.74%0.21%14.44%62.25%11.28%-44.31%-0.32%-39.82%-23.08%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and PXJ is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between XOP and PXJ has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XOP vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
PXJ

Energy

96.8%
67.7%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Industrials

2.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

2.1%

Energy

XOP
96.8%
PXJ
67.7%

Basic Materials

XOP
3.2%
PXJ

-

Industrials

XOP
2.2%
PXJ
2.7%

Communication Services

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

PXJ
0.2%

Healthcare

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Real Estate

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Technology

XOP

-

PXJ

-

Utilities

XOP

-

PXJ
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

PXJ
PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOPPXJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.37

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.44

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.61

12.34

-8.73

XOP vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOP vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, roughly equal to the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and PXJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPPXJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-94.82%

+4.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-18.39%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-40.03%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-40.03%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-87.72%

+5.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.30%

-67.70%

+29.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.57%

-55.72%

+13.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.58%

5.17%

+2.41%

Volatility

XOP vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) have volatilities of 8.61% and 8.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPPXJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

8.58%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.15%

19.21%

+2.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.35%

26.83%

+1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.79%

34.36%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.17%

39.20%

+0.97%

XOP vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOP vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than PXJ's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PXJ
Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF
2.47%2.91%3.34%1.99%0.65%2.40%4.72%1.87%0.99%2.75%1.18%2.36%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
1.97%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOP and PXJ have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to PXJ (8.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

On 10-year performance, XOP leads with 3.69% vs -1.35% for PXJ. On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XOP has performed better with a 3.69% return vs -1.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.97% for XOP.

XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while PXJ tracks Dynamic Oil & Gas Services Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.63% for PXJ.

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and PXJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer