XOP vs. POW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. XOP is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. XOP charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

XOP vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOP achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 38.93% return.

XOP

• 1D: 4.17%
• 1M: 0.40%
• 6M: 30.68%
• YTD: 32.00%
• 1Y: 27.02%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 16.31%
• 10Y*: 3.69%

POW

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.76%
• 6M: 31.71%
• YTD: 38.93%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	32.00%	-0.91%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	38.93%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and POW is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

XOP vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP

XOP Risk / Return Rank: 32
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 31

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOP	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.61	—	—

Drawdowns

XOP vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -18.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOP	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-18.37%	-71.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.98%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-38.30%	-18.37%	-19.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.57%	-4.33%	-38.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.58%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XOP	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.61%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.35%	32.94%	-4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.79%	32.94%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.17%	32.94%	+7.23%

XOP vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOP has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOP vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF	1.97%	2.62%	2.45%	2.63%	2.47%	1.61%	2.34%	1.47%	0.99%	0.76%	0.76%	2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOP and POW in my portfolio?

XOP and POW have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XOP or POW?

On fees, XOP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOP or POW?

XOP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOP or POW?

XOP has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

What is the main difference between XOP and POW?

XOP is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XOP and 0.75% for POW.