PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOP vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XOP having a 23.89% return and ENFR slightly higher at 24.93%. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 3.09%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.


XOP

1D
0.09%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
23.89%
6M
23.68%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
3.09%

ENFR

1D
1.51%
1M
-4.52%
YTD
24.93%
6M
25.03%
1Y
27.76%
3Y*
28.90%
5Y*
20.07%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
23.89%-2.15%-1.00%3.56%45.37%66.74%-36.40%-9.44%-28.10%-9.47%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.93%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between XOP and ENFR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.74

The correlation between XOP and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XOP vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XOP
ENFR

Energy

96.8%
98.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.4%

Energy

XOP
96.8%
ENFR
98.5%

Basic Materials

XOP
3.2%
ENFR

-

Communication Services

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Financial Services

XOP

-

ENFR
0.1%

Healthcare

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Industrials

XOP

-

ENFR
3.4%

Real Estate

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Technology

XOP

-

ENFR

-

Utilities

XOP

-

ENFR
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOP
XOP Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOP Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOP Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOPENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.32

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.23

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

8.24

-4.74

XOP vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOP Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOP and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and ENFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOPENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.27%

-68.28%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.50%

-8.64%

-9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.98%

-15.58%

-19.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.98%

-20.29%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.61%

-62.64%

-19.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.09%

-4.71%

-37.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.58%

-15.94%

-26.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.60%

3.38%

+3.22%

Volatility

XOP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.69%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOPENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.01%

5.69%

+3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.96%

11.60%

+10.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

14.86%

+13.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.88%

19.25%

+14.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.25%

24.68%

+15.57%

XOP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XOP and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

XOP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.02%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
XOP
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF
2.10%2.62%2.45%2.63%2.47%1.61%2.34%1.47%0.99%0.76%0.76%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOP and ENFR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOP has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to ENFR (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.98% vs 3.09% for XOP. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XOP and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.10% for XOP.

XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C.

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOP and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer