XOP vs. ENFR
XOP (SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XOP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry while ENFR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XOP returned 3.09%/yr vs 11.98%/yr for ENFR. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
XOP vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XOP having a 23.89% return and ENFR slightly higher at 24.93%. Over the past 10 years, XOP has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 3.09%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.98% annualized return.
XOP
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 23.89%
- 6M
- 23.68%
- 1Y
- 23.02%
- 3Y*
- 11.00%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
ENFR
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 6M
- 25.03%
- 1Y
- 27.76%
- 3Y*
- 28.90%
- 5Y*
- 20.07%
- 10Y*
- 11.98%
XOP vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 23.89% | -2.15% | -1.00% | 3.56% | 45.37% | 66.74% | -36.40% | -9.44% | -28.10% | -9.47% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.93% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOP and ENFR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XOP and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XOP vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XOP
ENFR
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XOP
ENFR
Basic Materials
XOP
ENFR
-
Communication Services
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Consumer Cyclical
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Consumer Defensive
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Financial Services
XOP
-
ENFR
Healthcare
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Industrials
XOP
-
ENFR
Real Estate
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Technology
XOP
-
ENFR
-
Utilities
XOP
-
ENFR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOP vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
XOP
ENFR
XOP vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.32 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 3.23 | -1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 8.24 | -4.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOP vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOP drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOP and ENFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.27% | -68.28% | -21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.50% | -8.64% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.98% | -15.58% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.98% | -20.29% | -14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -82.61% | -62.64% | -19.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.09% | -4.71% | -37.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.58% | -15.94% | -26.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.60% | 3.38% | +3.22% |
Volatility
XOP vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF (XOP) has a higher volatility of 9.01% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.69%. This indicates that XOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOP | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.01% | 5.69% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.96% | 11.60% | +10.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.30% | 14.86% | +13.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 19.25% | +14.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.25% | 24.68% | +15.57% |
XOP vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XOP and ENFR have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
XOP vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
XOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
XOP SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF | 2.10% | 2.62% | 2.45% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 1.61% | 2.34% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 0.76% | 0.76% | 2.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOP and ENFR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOP has higher volatility (9.01%) compared to ENFR (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOP dropped -90.27% vs ENFR's -68.28%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 11.98% vs 3.09% for XOP. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 11.98% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOP and ENFR have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.10% for XOP.
XOP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOP and ENFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer