PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMX vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMX vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMX achieves a 41.72% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's -11.04% return.


XOMX

1D
1.24%
1M
14.89%
6M
22.78%
YTD
41.72%
1Y
72.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.49%

TMF

1D
-2.07%
1M
-9.25%
6M
-12.35%
YTD
-11.04%
1Y
-4.28%
3Y*
-21.59%
5Y*
-33.52%
10Y*
-17.99%
ALL TIME*
-6.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMX vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMX and TMF is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMX vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMX vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMXTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.00

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

-0.16

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.53

-0.32

+4.86

XOMX vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMX and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMX vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMX drawdown since its inception was -39.64%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMX and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMXTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.64%

-92.89%

+53.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.64%

-26.51%

-13.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.59%

-92.64%

+64.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-43.97%

+33.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.02%

13.22%

+2.80%

Volatility

XOMX vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.53%. This indicates that XOMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMXTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

7.53%

+7.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.93%

19.87%

+22.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.78%

27.62%

+22.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.59%

46.39%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.59%

43.72%

+4.87%

XOMX vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMX vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

XOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than TMF's 4.44% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
4.44%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
1.86%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMX and TMF have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMX has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to TMF (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMX dropped -39.64% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 1-year performance, XOMX leads with 72.36% vs -4.28% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMX has performed better with a 72.36% return vs -4.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XOMX.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 1.86% for XOMX.

XOMX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XOMX and 1.01% for TMF.

XOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMX and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer