PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMX vs. TMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMX vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMX achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than TMF's 0.10% return.


XOMX

1D
-0.33%
1M
-13.46%
YTD
20.25%
6M
19.82%
1Y
40.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TMF

1D
0.27%
1M
6.27%
YTD
0.10%
6M
-2.84%
1Y
0.22%
3Y*
-19.40%
5Y*
-30.88%
10Y*
-17.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMX vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMX and TMF is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2025

-0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMX vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMX
XOMX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
XOMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TMF
TMF Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMX vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XOMXTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.02

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

0.01

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

0.02

+2.85

XOMX vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMX and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XOMX vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMX drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMX and TMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMXTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-92.89%

+53.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-26.51%

-12.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.41%

-91.71%

+52.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-43.81%

+34.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.12%

12.38%

+1.74%

Volatility

XOMX vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares (XOMX) has a higher volatility of 15.71% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 7.11%. This indicates that XOMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMXTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.71%

7.11%

+8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.54%

19.60%

+22.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.41%

28.04%

+21.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.28%

46.59%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.28%

43.80%

+4.48%

XOMX vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMX has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMX vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

XOMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than TMF's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TMF
Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF
3.94%4.06%4.29%2.82%1.62%0.13%2.23%0.94%1.49%0.41%
XOMX
Direxion Daily XOM Bull 2X Shares
2.19%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMX and TMF have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMX has higher volatility (15.71%) compared to TMF (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOMX dropped -39.41% vs TMF's -92.89%.

On 1-year performance, XOMX leads with 40.32% vs 0.22% for TMF. On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMX has performed better with a 40.32% return vs 0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for XOMX.

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.19% for XOMX.

XOMX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for XOMX and 1.01% for TMF.

XOMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMX and TMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer