PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. GRNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOMO vs. GRNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than GRNI's 9.53% return.


XOMO

1D
1.39%
1M
-1.15%
YTD
17.25%
6M
19.54%
1Y
30.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GRNI

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.46%
YTD
9.53%
6M
8.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOMO vs. GRNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and GRNI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. GRNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. GRNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOGRNIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.35

XOMO vs. GRNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOGRNIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

1.45

-1.06

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. GRNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, which is greater than GRNI's maximum drawdown of -9.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and GRNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOGRNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-9.55%

-9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.89%

-0.70%

-9.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-2.12%

-5.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.88%

Volatility

XOMO vs. GRNI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOMOGRNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

17.34%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.34%

+1.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.95%

17.34%

+1.61%

XOMO vs. GRNI - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOMO vs. GRNI - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.77%, more than GRNI's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
GRNI
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF
4.79%0.83%0.00%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
34.77%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOMO and GRNI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRNI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRNI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 34.77%, compared with 4.79% for GRNI.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for GRNI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOMO and GRNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer