XOMO vs. GRNI
XOMO (YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF) and GRNI (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. XOMO charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GRNI.
Performance
XOMO vs. GRNI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than GRNI's 9.53% return.
XOMO
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- YTD
- 17.25%
- 6M
- 19.54%
- 1Y
- 30.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNI
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 3.46%
- YTD
- 9.53%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XOMO vs. GRNI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 17.25% | 1.04% |
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 9.53% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOMO and GRNI is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOMO vs. GRNI — Risk / Return Rank
XOMO
GRNI
XOMO vs. GRNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XOMO | GRNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.55 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.06 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XOMO | GRNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 1.45 | -1.06 |
Drawdowns
XOMO vs. GRNI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, which is greater than GRNI's maximum drawdown of -9.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and GRNI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOMO | GRNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -9.55% | -9.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.89% | -0.70% | -9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -2.12% | -5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.88% | — | — |
Volatility
XOMO vs. GRNI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOMO | GRNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 17.34% | +2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.34% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.95% | 17.34% | +1.61% |
XOMO vs. GRNI - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNI's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOMO vs. GRNI - Dividend Comparison
XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 34.77%, more than GRNI's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNI Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF | 4.79% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOMO YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF | 34.77% | 31.64% | 26.94% | 5.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOMO and GRNI have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GRNI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GRNI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.
XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 34.77%, compared with 4.79% for GRNI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for XOMO and 0.99% for GRNI.
Find the right allocation for XOMO and GRNI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer