PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GRNI vs. QDVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GRNI vs. QDVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNI achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly higher than QDVO's 5.51% return.


GRNI

1D
-1.14%
1M
0.03%
YTD
7.47%
6M
6.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QDVO

1D
-1.31%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
5.51%
6M
4.58%
1Y
21.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNI vs. QDVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GRNI and QDVO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.79

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GRNI vs. QDVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QDVO
QDVO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
QDVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNI vs. QDVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI) and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF (QDVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GRNIQDVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.08

GRNI vs. QDVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GRNI vs. QDVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNI drawdown since its inception was -9.55%, smaller than the maximum QDVO drawdown of -17.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNI and QDVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GRNIQDVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.55%

-17.75%

+8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.61%

-4.81%

+2.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-2.41%

+0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

Volatility

GRNI vs. QDVO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GRNIQDVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.55%

12.69%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

17.54%

+0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.55%

17.54%

+0.01%

GRNI vs. QDVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

GRNI vs. QDVO - Dividend Comparison

GRNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than QDVO's 10.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
GRNI
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF
4.88%0.83%0.00%
QDVO
Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF
10.53%9.92%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


GRNI and QDVO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GRNI.

QDVO has the higher dividend yield at 10.53%, compared with 4.88% for GRNI.

They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GRNI and 0.56% for QDVO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GRNI and QDVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer