PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOMO vs. GOOP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XOMO vs. GOOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XOMO vs. GOOP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-2.30%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
-7.56%52.46%27.67%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOMO achieves a 23.45% return, which is significantly higher than GOOP's -7.56% return.


XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOP

1D
4.38%
1M
-3.40%
YTD
-7.56%
6M
15.37%
1Y
68.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XOMO vs. GOOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOMO has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOP's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XOMO vs. GOOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOP
GOOP Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
GOOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOP Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOMO vs. GOOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XOMOGOOPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.02

2.41

-1.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

3.20

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.42

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

3.03

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.35

12.30

-8.94

XOMO vs. GOOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the GOOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOMO and GOOP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOMOGOOPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

2.41

-1.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.26

-0.71

Correlation

The correlation between XOMO and GOOP is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

XOMO vs. GOOP - Dividend Comparison

XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 30.57%, more than GOOP's 13.52% yield.


TTM202520242023
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%
GOOP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF
13.52%11.79%13.73%2.06%

Drawdowns

XOMO vs. GOOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOMO drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum GOOP drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOMO and GOOP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XOMOGOOPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-27.49%

+8.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.24%

-23.32%

+8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.12%

-15.24%

+10.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.05%

-6.44%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

5.75%

+0.94%

Volatility

XOMO vs. GOOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is 6.57%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Google ETF (GOOP) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that XOMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XOMOGOOPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.57%

11.35%

-4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

20.01%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.02%

28.37%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.46%

24.75%

-6.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

24.75%

-6.29%