XOEF vs. SPVM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM).

XOEF and SPVM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XOEF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index. It was launched on Jul 8, 2025. SPVM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index. It was launched on Jun 16, 2011. Both XOEF and SPVM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XOEF vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XOEF vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	2.96%	4.15%
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	2.48%	13.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 2.96% return, which is significantly higher than SPVM's 2.48% return.

XOEF

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: -4.86%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 3.90%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SPVM

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -3.84%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: 6.70%
• 1Y: 23.16%
• 3Y*: 15.82%
• 5Y*: 10.59%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.

SPVM

Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF

XOEF

iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF

Return for Risk

XOEF vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPVM

SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 74
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XOEF	SPVM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.60	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.61	+0.18

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and SPVM is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XOEF vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than SPVM's 2.02% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	0.87%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF	2.02%	2.02%	1.91%	2.45%	2.33%	1.41%	2.11%	2.40%	3.10%	1.68%	2.80%	2.67%

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and SPVM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOEF	SPVM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-45.35%	+37.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.37%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.97%	-4.08%	-0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.43%	-5.03%	+3.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.65%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XOEF	SPVM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.49%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.82%	16.65%	-3.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.82%	16.85%	-4.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.82%	19.58%	-6.76%