SPVM vs. VTV
SPVM (Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SPVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPVM returned 12.34%/yr vs 12.95%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SPVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
SPVM vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPVM achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 14.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SPVM having a 12.34% annualized return and VTV not far ahead at 12.95%.
SPVM
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 2.61%
- YTD
- 9.93%
- 6M
- 9.00%
- 1Y
- 28.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
VTV
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 14.47%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 27.19%
- 3Y*
- 18.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.95%
SPVM vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 9.93% | 20.47% | 15.64% | 5.53% | -2.10% | 28.86% | -3.18% | 29.33% | -9.17% | 14.70% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 14.47% | 15.27% | 15.95% | 9.32% | -2.09% | 26.53% | 2.33% | 25.66% | -5.47% | 17.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPVM and VTV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2011 | 0.85 |
The correlation between SPVM and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
SPVM vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SPVM
VTV
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
SPVM
VTV
Utilities
SPVM
VTV
Energy
SPVM
VTV
Consumer Defensive
SPVM
VTV
Consumer Cyclical
SPVM
VTV
Communication Services
SPVM
VTV
Technology
SPVM
VTV
Healthcare
SPVM
VTV
Industrials
SPVM
VTV
Basic Materials
SPVM
VTV
Real Estate
SPVM
VTV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPVM vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
SPVM
VTV
SPVM vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SPVM | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.47 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 4.30 | +0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.80 | 16.20 | +0.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SPVM vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPVM drawdown since its inception was -45.35%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPVM and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPVM | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.35% | -59.27% | +13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -6.35% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.66% | -14.52% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.48% | -17.04% | -2.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.35% | -36.78% | -8.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.56% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.98% | -7.85% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.73% | 1.68% | +0.05% |
Volatility
SPVM vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 3.27% and 3.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPVM | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 3.41% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.72% | 7.85% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 10.39% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 13.88% | +2.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 16.65% | +2.91% |
SPVM vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPVM vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
SPVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, more than VTV's 1.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPVM Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF | 2.02% | 2.02% | 1.91% | 2.45% | 2.33% | 1.41% | 2.11% | 2.40% | 3.10% | 1.68% | 2.80% | 2.67% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.83% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPVM and VTV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTV has higher volatility (3.41%) compared to SPVM (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SPVM dropped -45.35% vs VTV's -59.27%.
On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.95% vs 12.34% for SPVM. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.95% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for SPVM.
SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 2.02%, compared with 1.83% for VTV.
SPVM is categorized as Momentum, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPVM tracks S&P 500 High Momentum Value Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for SPVM and 0.04% for VTV.
VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SPVM and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer