XOEF vs. BUFP

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and BUFP (PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while BUFP is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XOEF returned 18.97% vs 13.37% for BUFP. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BUFP.

Performance

XOEF vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's 6.49% return.

XOEF

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -1.24%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 13.96%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 18.24%

BUFP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.44%
• 6M: 5.70%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 1Y: 13.37%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	13.96%	4.27%
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	6.49%	7.17%

Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and BUFP is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	0.76

The correlation between XOEF and BUFP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XOEF vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

XOEF Risk / Return Rank: 63
XOEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XOEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
XOEF Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XOEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
XOEF Martin Ratio Rank: 72

BUFP

BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 87
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XOEF	BUFP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.48	2.11	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.15	3.12	-0.97
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.43	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.49	3.04	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.52	16.46	-6.94

XOEF vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XOEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XOEF and BUFP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum BUFP drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and BUFP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XOEF	BUFP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.66%	-11.98%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.66%	-4.41%	-3.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.87%	-0.71%	-2.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.27%	-0.97%	-0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	0.81%	+1.19%

Volatility

XOEF vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) at 1.41%. This indicates that XOEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XOEF	BUFP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.32%	1.41%	+1.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	5.20%	+4.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.86%	6.37%	+6.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.76%	9.33%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.76%	9.33%	+3.43%

XOEF vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XOEF vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than BUFP's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BUFP PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.02%
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF	1.06%	0.63%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XOEF and BUFP in my portfolio?

XOEF and BUFP have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XOEF or BUFP?

XOEF has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to BUFP (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEF dropped -7.66% vs BUFP's -11.98%.

Which ETF is better, XOEF or BUFP?

On 1-year performance, XOEF leads with 18.97% vs 13.37% for BUFP. On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, BUFP has been the lower-risk option at 1.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XOEF or BUFP?

Over the 1-year period, XOEF has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 13.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XOEF or BUFP?

XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for BUFP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XOEF or BUFP?

XOEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.01% for BUFP.

What is the main difference between XOEF and BUFP?

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while BUFP is Defined Outcome. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while BUFP tracks S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.50% for BUFP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BUFP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.