PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XOEF vs. RSPT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XOEF vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 12.43% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 35.60% return.


XOEF

1D
-1.83%
1M
1.36%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.72%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSPT

1D
-6.72%
1M
9.06%
YTD
35.60%
6M
32.80%
1Y
61.71%
3Y*
30.41%
5Y*
17.50%
10Y*
21.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XOEF vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XOEF and RSPT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XOEF vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XOEF

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XOEF vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XOEF vs. RSPT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XOEFRSPTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.63

+0.87

Drawdowns

XOEF vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum RSPT drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and RSPT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XOEFRSPTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-58.91%

+51.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-8.64%

+6.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-8.90%

+7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.00%

Volatility

XOEF vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XOEFRSPTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.73%

22.62%

-9.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.73%

24.26%

-11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

23.87%

-11.14%

XOEF vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

XOEF vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison

XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than RSPT's 0.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.28%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%
XOEF
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF
0.80%0.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XOEF and RSPT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.

XOEF has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.28% for RSPT.

XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPT is Technology Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.40% for RSPT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XOEF and RSPT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer