XOEF vs. RSPT
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and RSPT (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while RSPT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPT.
Performance
XOEF vs. RSPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than RSPT's 39.22% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSPT
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 39.22%
- 6M
- 36.93%
- 1Y
- 57.26%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.49%
- 10Y*
- 21.99%
XOEF vs. RSPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 16.44% | 4.27% |
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 39.22% | 9.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and RSPT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.78 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. RSPT — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
RSPT
XOEF vs. RSPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. RSPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum RSPT drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and RSPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -58.91% | +51.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.20% | +6.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -8.89% | +7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.49% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. RSPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | RSPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.43% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 20.00% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 23.94% | -11.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 24.56% | -11.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 23.92% | -11.03% |
XOEF vs. RSPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPT's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEF vs. RSPT - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than RSPT's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.26% | 0.39% | 0.44% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.04% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and RSPT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPT.
XOEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.26% for RSPT.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while RSPT is Technology Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.40% for RSPT.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and RSPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer