RSPT vs. QTEC
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC).
RSPT and QTEC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RSPT is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500® Information Technology Index. It was launched on Jan 11, 2006. QTEC is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. It was launched on Apr 19, 2006. Both RSPT and QTEC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: RSPT or QTEC.
Key characteristics
| RSPT | QTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 18.12% | 12.17% |
| 1Y Return | 31.28% | 25.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.05% | 3.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 15.91% | 16.06% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.95% | 17.24% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.83 | 1.29 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.44 | 1.78 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.23 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.76 | 1.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.91 | 5.13 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.98% | 5.80% |
| Daily Std Dev | 19.37% | 23.09% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.91% | -58.86% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.44% | -4.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSPT and QTEC is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
RSPT vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 18.12% return, which is significantly higher than QTEC's 12.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPT having a 16.95% annualized return and QTEC not far ahead at 17.24%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RSPT vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
RSPT vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
RSPT vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison
RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than QTEC's 0.04% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPT Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.71% | 0.50% | 1.29% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.84% | 1.16% | 1.18% | 1.16% | 0.80% |
QTEC First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund | 0.04% | 0.14% | 0.15% | 0.02% | 0.44% | 0.68% | 0.91% | 0.80% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.22% | 0.72% |
Drawdowns
RSPT vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and QTEC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
RSPT vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 5.70%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 6.69%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.