PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RSPT vs. QTEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RSPT vs. QTEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSPT achieves a 32.97% return, which is significantly higher than QTEC's 29.69% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RSPT having a 20.76% annualized return and QTEC not far ahead at 21.00%.


RSPT

1D
0.57%
1M
-1.55%
6M
29.00%
YTD
32.97%
1Y
48.80%
3Y*
26.40%
5Y*
15.76%
10Y*
20.76%
ALL TIME*
14.46%

QTEC

1D
0.27%
1M
-5.23%
6M
26.76%
YTD
29.69%
1Y
42.45%
3Y*
23.84%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
21.00%
ALL TIME*
14.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$78.15M$73.99M$89.17M
$35.57M$47.88M$43.46M

RSPT vs. QTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
32.97%22.15%15.16%35.18%-24.50%28.53%30.21%42.07%-0.61%32.98%
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
29.69%22.28%7.32%67.02%-39.83%26.89%38.76%48.22%-4.62%37.78%

Correlation

The correlation between RSPT and QTEC is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006

0.92

The correlation between RSPT and QTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

RSPT vs. QTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RSPT
QTEC

Technology

98.7%
85.4%

Communication Services

1.3%
8.3%

Energy

1.3%

-

Industrials

0.8%
2.1%

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

RSPT
98.7%
QTEC
85.4%

Communication Services

RSPT
1.3%
QTEC
8.3%

Energy

RSPT
1.3%
QTEC

-

Industrials

RSPT
0.8%
QTEC
2.1%

Financial Services

RSPT
0.0%
QTEC

-

Basic Materials

RSPT

-

QTEC

-

Consumer Cyclical

RSPT

-

QTEC
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

RSPT

-

QTEC

-

Healthcare

RSPT

-

QTEC

-

Real Estate

RSPT

-

QTEC

-

Utilities

RSPT

-

QTEC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RSPT vs. QTEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RSPT
RSPT Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QTEC
QTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RSPT vs. QTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) and First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RSPTQTECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

2.46

+1.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.14

6.90

+3.24

RSPT vs. QTEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the QTEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSPT and QTEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RSPT vs. QTEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSPT drawdown since its inception was -58.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QTEC drawdown of -58.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSPT and QTEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RSPTQTECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.91%

-58.86%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.29%

-16.03%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-29.00%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.49%

-45.54%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.67%

-45.54%

+11.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.42%

-11.08%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.89%

-9.86%

+0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.56%

5.72%

-1.16%

Volatility

RSPT vs. QTEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF (RSPT) is 7.20%, while First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) has a volatility of 9.69%. This indicates that RSPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RSPTQTECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

9.69%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.62%

23.97%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.95%

28.24%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.73%

30.05%

-5.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.00%

27.88%

-3.88%

RSPT vs. QTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSPT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QTEC's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

RSPT vs. QTEC - Dividend Comparison

RSPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, more than QTEC's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QTEC
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index Fund
0.01%0.00%0.02%0.14%0.15%0.02%0.44%0.68%0.91%0.80%1.29%0.99%
RSPT
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Technology ETF
0.27%0.39%0.44%0.56%0.71%0.50%1.29%0.92%0.98%0.84%1.16%1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, RSPT and QTEC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QTEC has higher volatility (9.69%) compared to RSPT (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSPT dropped -58.91% vs QTEC's -58.86%.

On 10-year performance, QTEC leads with 21.00% vs 20.76% for RSPT. On fees, RSPT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPT has been the lower-risk option at 7.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QTEC has performed better with a 21.00% return vs 20.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RSPT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for QTEC.

RSPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.01% for QTEC.

RSPT is categorized as Technology Equities, while QTEC is Nasdaq-100. RSPT tracks S&P 500® Information Technology Index, while QTEC tracks NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for RSPT and 0.57% for QTEC.

RSPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RSPT and QTEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer