XOEF vs. PMFB
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and PMFB (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while PMFB is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by PGIM. XOEF is passively managed, while PMFB is actively managed. Over the past year, XOEF returned 18.97% vs 6.61% for PMFB. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMFB.
Performance
XOEF vs. PMFB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 13.96% return, which is significantly higher than PMFB's 2.86% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- 6M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 18.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.24%
PMFB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 6.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.38%
XOEF vs. PMFB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 13.96% | 4.27% |
PMFB PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February | 2.86% | 4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and PMFB is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.73 |
The correlation between XOEF and PMFB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. PMFB — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
PMFB
XOEF vs. PMFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | PMFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.69 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 4.95 | -2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 24.98 | -15.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. PMFB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, which is greater than PMFB's maximum drawdown of -2.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and PMFB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | PMFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -2.94% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.66% | -1.34% | -6.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.87% | -0.16% | -2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -0.35% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.00% | 0.27% | +1.73% |
Volatility
XOEF vs. PMFB - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February (PMFB) at 0.42%. This indicates that XOEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | PMFB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 0.42% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 1.55% | +8.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 2.08% | +10.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 2.70% | +10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 2.70% | +10.06% |
XOEF vs. PMFB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than PMFB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEF vs. PMFB - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, while PMFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PMFB PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.06% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and PMFB have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XOEF has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PMFB (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XOEF dropped -7.66% vs PMFB's -2.94%.
On 1-year performance, XOEF leads with 18.97% vs 6.61% for PMFB. On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, PMFB has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XOEF has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 6.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PMFB.
XOEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.00% for PMFB.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while PMFB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.50% for PMFB.
PMFB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and PMFB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer