XOEF vs. IYW
XOEF (iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF) and IYW (iShares U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XOEF is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while IYW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XOEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYW.
Performance
XOEF vs. IYW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XOEF achieves a 16.44% return, which is significantly lower than IYW's 23.38% return.
XOEF
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 16.44%
- 6M
- 15.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYW
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- -2.62%
- YTD
- 23.38%
- 6M
- 22.00%
- 1Y
- 43.52%
- 3Y*
- 31.55%
- 5Y*
- 20.24%
- 10Y*
- 25.75%
XOEF vs. IYW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 16.44% | 4.27% |
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 23.38% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between XOEF and IYW is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.62 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XOEF vs. IYW — Risk / Return Rank
XOEF
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IYW
XOEF vs. IYW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF (XOEF) and iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XOEF | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XOEF vs. IYW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XOEF drawdown since its inception was -7.66%, smaller than the maximum IYW drawdown of -81.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XOEF and IYW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XOEF | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.66% | -81.90% | +74.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -17.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.25% | +5.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.27% | -34.58% | +33.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.64% | — |
Volatility
XOEF vs. IYW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XOEF | IYW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.89% | 22.53% | -9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 26.27% | -13.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.89% | 25.25% | -12.36% |
XOEF vs. IYW - Expense Ratio Comparison
XOEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IYW's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
XOEF vs. IYW - Dividend Comparison
XOEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than IYW's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYW iShares U.S. Technology ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.31% | 0.56% | 0.72% | 0.92% | 0.82% | 1.14% | 1.12% |
XOEF iShares S&P 500 ex S&P 100 ETF | 1.04% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XOEF and IYW have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XOEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XOEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYW.
XOEF has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.10% for IYW.
XOEF is categorized as S&P 500, while IYW is Technology Equities. XOEF tracks S&P 500 Ex-S&P 100 Select Index, while IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XOEF and 0.38% for IYW.
Find the right allocation for XOEF and IYW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer