PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XNTK vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XNTK vs. UCO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XNTK (SPDR NYSE Technology ETF) and UCO (ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil) are both exchange-traded funds - XNTK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NYSE Technology Index, while UCO is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XNTK returned 25.76%/yr vs -11.55%/yr for UCO. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XNTK charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for UCO.

Performance

XNTK vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XNTK achieves a 39.42% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 142.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XNTK has outperformed UCO with an annualized return of 25.76%, while UCO has yielded a comparatively lower -11.55% annualized return.

XNTK

1D
2.68%
1M
22.48%
YTD
39.42%
6M
38.46%
1Y
78.56%
3Y*
43.30%
5Y*
21.80%
10Y*
25.76%

UCO

1D
2.52%
1M
0.21%
YTD
142.55%
6M
133.13%
1Y
118.05%
3Y*
24.78%
5Y*
21.76%
10Y*
-11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XNTK vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		39.42%38.06%23.49%70.13%-41.07%17.63%73.91%38.08%-7.13%40.37%
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		142.55%-29.75%5.36%-13.89%39.71%139.26%-92.91%53.83%-43.26%0.34%

Correlation

The correlation between XNTK and UCO is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2008

0.25

The correlation between XNTK and UCO shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR NYSE Technology ETF

ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil

Often compared with XNTK:
XNTK vs. QQQXNTK vs. VGTXNTK vs. IYWXNTK vs. VOOXNTK vs. PNQIXNTK vs. OGIGXNTK vs. XSW
Often compared with UCO:
UCO vs. USOUCO vs. SCOUCO vs. OILUUCO vs. BOILUCO vs. ERXUCO vs. LABUUCO vs. OIH

Return for Risk

XNTK vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XNTK
XNTK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
XNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
XNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XNTK vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XNTKUCODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.39

2.08

+1.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.98

2.43

+1.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.32

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

3.78

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.66

7.17

+8.49

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XNTK vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XNTK Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is higher than the UCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XNTK and UCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XNTKUCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39

2.08

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.37

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

-0.16

+1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

-0.34

+0.79

Drawdowns

XNTK vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XNTK drawdown since its inception was -72.38%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XNTK and UCO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XNTKUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.38%

-99.95%

+27.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.00%

-34.77%

+17.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.11%

-50.38%

+22.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.28%

-67.24%

+18.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.28%

-98.75%

+50.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-99.25%

+99.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.30%

-85.48%

+64.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

18.32%

-13.23%

Volatility

XNTK vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR NYSE Technology ETF (XNTK) is 7.52%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a volatility of 22.10%. This indicates that XNTK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XNTKUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.52%

22.10%

-14.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.05%

46.40%

-28.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

57.35%

-34.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.91%

59.77%

-31.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.64%

71.36%

-44.72%

XNTK vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XNTK has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

XNTK vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

XNTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UCO
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XNTK
SPDR NYSE Technology ETF		0.16%0.23%0.42%0.34%0.85%0.34%0.30%0.61%29.64%1.29%0.81%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions

XNTK and UCO have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UCO has higher volatility (22.10%) compared to XNTK (7.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XNTK dropped -72.38% vs UCO's -99.95%.

On 10-year performance, XNTK leads with 25.76% vs -11.55% for UCO. On fees, XNTK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XNTK has been the lower-risk option at 7.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XNTK has performed better with a 25.76% return vs -11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XNTK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

XNTK has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

XNTK is categorized as Technology Equities, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. XNTK tracks NYSE Technology Index, while UCO tracks Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XNTK and 0.95% for UCO.

XNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.39 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XNTK and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer