PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMVM vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMVM vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.


XMVM

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.18%
YTD
8.00%
6M
10.89%
1Y
29.16%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
9.63%
10Y*
11.74%

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVM vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
8.00%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%3.93%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and USVM is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.89

The correlation between XMVM and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

XMVM vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMVM
USVM

Financial Services

41.8%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
11.1%

Utilities

9.9%
6.4%

Industrials

8.6%
12.1%

Energy

8.3%
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
5.0%

Real Estate

4.3%
11.9%

Technology

3.6%
11.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.8%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.8%

Healthcare

0.7%
11.0%

Financial Services

XMVM
41.8%
USVM
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XMVM
14.5%
USVM
11.1%

Utilities

XMVM
9.9%
USVM
6.4%

Industrials

XMVM
8.6%
USVM
12.1%

Energy

XMVM
8.3%
USVM
4.4%

Consumer Defensive

XMVM
7.3%
USVM
5.0%

Real Estate

XMVM
4.3%
USVM
11.9%

Technology

XMVM
3.6%
USVM
11.6%

Communication Services

XMVM
1.0%
USVM
2.8%

Basic Materials

XMVM
0.8%
USVM
1.8%

Healthcare

XMVM
0.7%
USVM
11.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMVM vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVM vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XMVMUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

3.66

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

13.76

-3.90

XMVM vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVM Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVM and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XMVMUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.05

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.50

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.49

-0.06

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMVMUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.83%

-42.38%

-20.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.18%

-8.36%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.12%

-24.34%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-25.27%

+1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-0.57%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-7.90%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

2.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

XMVM vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 3.38%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMVMUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

4.50%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.77%

10.73%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

14.93%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.54%

19.65%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

22.01%

+0.79%

XMVM vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMVM vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, more than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.96%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMVM and USVM have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to XMVM (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 9.63% for XMVM. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.76% for USVM.

XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMVM and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer