XMVM vs. IWY

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMVM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMVM returned 12.28%/yr vs 19.24%/yr for IWY. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMVM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.

Performance

XMVM vs. IWY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMVM achieves a 12.14% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, XMVM has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 12.28%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 19.24% annualized return.

XMVM

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 5.33%
• YTD: 12.14%
• 6M: 10.01%
• 1Y: 33.41%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 10.66%
• 10Y*: 12.28%

IWY

• 1D: -0.00%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 2.99%
• 6M: 3.75%
• 1Y: 19.83%
• 3Y*: 23.03%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 19.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMVM vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	12.14%	18.46%	11.73%	16.31%	-8.21%	35.15%	5.68%	30.38%	-9.62%	2.79%
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	2.99%	18.19%	34.89%	46.49%	-29.91%	31.05%	39.01%	36.20%	-0.72%	31.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XMVM and IWY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between XMVM and IWY has dropped to 0.30 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XMVM vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMVM	IWY
Financial Services	41.8%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	11.4%
Utilities	9.9%	1.1%
Industrials	8.6%	4.0%
Energy	8.3%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	7.3%	3.0%
Real Estate	4.3%	0.3%
Technology	3.6%	54.9%
Communication Services	1.0%	13.9%
Basic Materials	0.8%	0.3%
Healthcare	0.7%	6.6%

Return for Risk

XMVM vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMVM

XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 77
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 76
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

IWY

IWY Risk / Return Rank: 35
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMVM vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMVM	IWY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	1.24	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	1.73	+1.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.22	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	1.20	+2.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.34	3.85	+7.49

XMVM vs. IWY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMVM Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the IWY Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMVM and IWY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMVM vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMVM drawdown since its inception was -62.83%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMVM and IWY.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMVM	IWY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.83%	-32.68%	-30.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-16.63%	+7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.12%	-23.22%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.12%	-32.68%	+8.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.07%	-32.68%	-12.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-5.68%	+5.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.26%	-4.75%	-5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	5.16%	-2.20%

Volatility

XMVM vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) is 3.24%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that XMVM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMVM	IWY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.24%	5.30%	-2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	12.38%	-2.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.32%	16.01%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.54%	21.54%	0.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.80%	21.01%	+1.79%

XMVM vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMVM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

XMVM vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison

XMVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than IWY's 0.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF	0.34%	0.36%	0.42%	0.68%	0.88%	0.50%	0.71%	1.06%	1.32%	1.26%	1.51%	1.58%
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF	1.89%	2.07%	1.43%	1.57%	1.76%	1.10%	1.37%	1.73%	2.87%	2.22%	2.27%	2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMVM and IWY in my portfolio?

XMVM and IWY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMVM or IWY?

IWY has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to XMVM (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMVM dropped -62.83% vs IWY's -32.68%.

Which ETF is better, XMVM or IWY?

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.24% vs 12.28% for XMVM. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMVM or IWY?

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.24% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMVM or IWY?

IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMVM or IWY?

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.34% for IWY.

What is the main difference between XMVM and IWY?

XMVM is categorized as Momentum, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for XMVM and 0.20% for IWY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.