XMPT vs. BIZD
XMPT (VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF) and BIZD (VanEck BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMPT is a High Yield Muni fund tracking the S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index, while BIZD is a Financials Equities fund tracking the MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMPT returned 1.98%/yr vs 7.56%/yr for BIZD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XMPT charges 1.97%/yr vs 12.86%/yr for BIZD.
Performance
XMPT vs. BIZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMPT achieves a 4.03% return, which is significantly higher than BIZD's -9.87% return. Over the past 10 years, XMPT has underperformed BIZD with an annualized return of 1.98%, while BIZD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.
XMPT
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 4.03%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- 13.45%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- -0.98%
- 10Y*
- 1.98%
BIZD
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- -9.87%
- 6M
- -8.40%
- 1Y
- -12.75%
- 3Y*
- 5.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
XMPT vs. BIZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 4.03% | 8.01% | 7.01% | 2.55% | -24.02% | 7.94% | 7.70% | 20.36% | -5.85% | 8.28% |
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | -9.87% | -4.96% | 15.63% | 27.02% | -8.51% | 36.25% | -7.12% | 30.87% | -6.88% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMPT and BIZD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2013 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMPT vs. BIZD — Risk / Return Rank
XMPT
BIZD
XMPT vs. BIZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) and VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMPT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.90 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | -0.58 | +2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.34 | -0.96 | +9.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMPT vs. BIZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMPT drawdown since its inception was -35.24%, smaller than the maximum BIZD drawdown of -55.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMPT and BIZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMPT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | -55.44% | +20.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.57% | -22.22% | +15.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.04% | -22.56% | +7.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.24% | -22.91% | -12.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.24% | -55.44% | +20.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.43% | -20.05% | +12.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -6.76% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 13.30% | -11.68% |
Volatility
XMPT vs. BIZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is 1.82%, while VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that XMPT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMPT | BIZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 5.60% | -3.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.09% | 15.19% | -9.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.28% | 18.50% | -11.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 17.44% | -8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 21.78% | -11.41% |
XMPT vs. BIZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMPT has a 1.97% expense ratio, which is lower than BIZD's 12.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMPT vs. BIZD - Dividend Comparison
XMPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than BIZD's 14.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIZD VanEck BDC Income ETF | 14.01% | 11.78% | 10.94% | 10.96% | 11.21% | 8.14% | 10.39% | 9.13% | 10.88% | 9.13% | 8.51% | 9.12% |
XMPT VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF | 6.23% | 5.87% | 5.35% | 3.81% | 5.12% | 3.74% | 3.79% | 4.08% | 5.05% | 4.84% | 5.35% | 5.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMPT and BIZD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BIZD has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to XMPT (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMPT dropped -35.24% vs BIZD's -55.44%.
On 10-year performance, BIZD leads with 7.56% vs 1.98% for XMPT. On fees, XMPT is cheaper at 1.97% per year. On volatility, XMPT has been the lower-risk option at 1.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BIZD has performed better with a 7.56% return vs 1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMPT is cheaper with a 1.97% expense ratio, compared with 12.86% for BIZD.
BIZD has the higher dividend yield at 14.01%, compared with 6.23% for XMPT.
XMPT is categorized as High Yield Muni, while BIZD is Financials Equities. XMPT tracks S-Network Municipal Bond Closed-End Fund Index, while BIZD tracks MVIS US Business Development Companies Index. Their fees differ too: 1.97% for XMPT and 12.86% for BIZD.
XMPT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMPT and BIZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer