XMMO vs. VIG
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for VIG. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
XMMO vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed VIG with an annualized return of 19.95%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively lower 13.24% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 18.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
XMMO vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and VIG is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XMMO and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMMO vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
VIG
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
VIG
Technology
XMMO
VIG
Energy
XMMO
VIG
Basic Materials
XMMO
VIG
Healthcare
XMMO
VIG
Real Estate
XMMO
VIG
-
Utilities
XMMO
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
VIG
Financial Services
XMMO
VIG
Communication Services
XMMO
VIG
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
VIG
XMMO vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 2.32 | +2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 9.34 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -46.81% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -7.91% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -14.95% | -9.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -20.39% | -7.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -31.72% | -5.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -0.33% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -5.51% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.96% | +0.13% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.93%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 2.93% | +6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 7.78% | +8.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 10.19% | +9.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 14.25% | +7.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 16.06% | +6.29% |
XMMO vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and VIG have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 13.24% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 13.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while VIG is Dividend. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.04% for VIG.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer