XMMO vs. PTH
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - XMMO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index while PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 18.83%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for PTH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.
Performance
XMMO vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 16.50% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 19.31% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed PTH with an annualized return of 18.83%, while PTH has yielded a comparatively lower 14.80% annualized return.
XMMO
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- 6M
- 13.31%
- YTD
- 16.50%
- 1Y
- 23.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.63%
- 5Y*
- 15.30%
- 10Y*
- 18.83%
PTH
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 21.15%
- YTD
- 19.31%
- 1Y
- 58.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.82%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.80%
XMMO vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 16.50% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 19.31% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and PTH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.70 |
The correlation between XMMO and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.70 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
PTH
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
XMMO
PTH
-
Technology
XMMO
PTH
-
Energy
XMMO
PTH
-
Healthcare
XMMO
PTH
Basic Materials
XMMO
PTH
-
Utilities
XMMO
PTH
-
Real Estate
XMMO
PTH
-
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
PTH
-
Financial Services
XMMO
PTH
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
PTH
-
Communication Services
XMMO
PTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
PTH
XMMO vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.39 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | 4.89 | -2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.60 | 12.39 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, roughly equal to the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -53.52% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.71% | -11.98% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -27.74% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -50.07% | +22.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -53.52% | +16.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.50% | -3.84% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.42% | -16.95% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.73% | -2.22% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) have volatilities of 6.93% and 6.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.93% | 6.65% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.50% | 19.20% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.67% | 24.30% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.75% | 25.65% | -3.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 27.32% | -4.97% |
XMMO vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than PTH's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.57% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and PTH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (6.93%) compared to PTH (6.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs PTH's -53.52%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 18.83% vs 14.80% for PTH. On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PTH has been the lower-risk option at 6.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 18.83% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.60% for XMMO.
XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.60% for PTH.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer