XMMO vs. IWY
XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) and IWY (iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while IWY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMMO returned 19.95%/yr vs 19.24%/yr for IWY. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMMO charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWY.
Performance
XMMO vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's 2.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMMO having a 19.95% annualized return and IWY not far behind at 19.24%.
XMMO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 22.77%
- 6M
- 22.33%
- 1Y
- 36.63%
- 3Y*
- 30.62%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.95%
IWY
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 3.75%
- 1Y
- 19.83%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 19.24%
XMMO vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 22.77% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 29.17% | 36.78% | 6.12% | 37.18% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 2.99% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMMO and IWY is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XMMO and IWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XMMO vs. IWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMMO
IWY
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Real Estate
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
XMMO
IWY
Technology
XMMO
IWY
Energy
XMMO
IWY
Basic Materials
XMMO
IWY
Healthcare
XMMO
IWY
Real Estate
XMMO
IWY
Utilities
XMMO
IWY
Consumer Cyclical
XMMO
IWY
Financial Services
XMMO
IWY
Communication Services
XMMO
IWY
Consumer Defensive
XMMO
IWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMMO vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
XMMO
IWY
XMMO vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMMO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.22 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 1.20 | +3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.54 | 3.85 | +13.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMMO vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and IWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMMO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.37% | -32.68% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -16.63% | +8.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.93% | -23.22% | -1.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.91% | -32.68% | +4.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.74% | -32.68% | -4.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -5.68% | +4.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.44% | -4.75% | -4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 5.16% | -3.07% |
Volatility
XMMO vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) at 5.30%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMMO | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.07% | 5.30% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.76% | 12.38% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.74% | 16.01% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.62% | 21.54% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.35% | 21.01% | +1.34% |
XMMO vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMMO vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, more than IWY's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMMO and IWY have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to IWY (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs IWY's -32.68%.
On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 19.24% for IWY. On fees, IWY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IWY has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 19.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IWY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.34% for IWY.
XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while IWY is Large Cap Growth Equities. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.20% for IWY.
XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMMO and IWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer