PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XMMO vs. DGRW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XMMO vs. DGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMMO achieves a 22.77% return, which is significantly higher than DGRW's 7.88% return. Over the past 10 years, XMMO has outperformed DGRW with an annualized return of 19.95%, while DGRW has yielded a comparatively lower 14.13% annualized return.


XMMO

1D
0.96%
1M
0.41%
YTD
22.77%
6M
22.33%
1Y
37.93%
3Y*
30.62%
5Y*
15.91%
10Y*
19.95%

DGRW

1D
0.50%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
7.88%
6M
7.92%
1Y
18.88%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XMMO vs. DGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
22.77%13.04%38.03%20.39%-16.02%16.69%29.17%36.78%6.12%37.18%
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
7.88%12.17%16.98%18.66%-6.33%24.46%13.87%29.54%-5.38%26.90%

Correlation

The correlation between XMMO and DGRW is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2013

0.77

The correlation between XMMO and DGRW shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMMO vs. DGRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XMMO
DGRW

Industrials

40.8%
9.9%

Technology

19.1%
32.1%

Basic Materials

7.0%
3.3%

Energy

6.8%
5.0%

Healthcare

6.3%
12.8%

Real Estate

5.7%

-

Utilities

5.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
7.1%

Financial Services

2.3%
11.3%

Communication Services

1.4%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
6.7%

Industrials

XMMO
40.8%
DGRW
9.9%

Technology

XMMO
19.1%
DGRW
32.1%

Basic Materials

XMMO
7.0%
DGRW
3.3%

Energy

XMMO
6.8%
DGRW
5.0%

Healthcare

XMMO
6.3%
DGRW
12.8%

Real Estate

XMMO
5.7%
DGRW

-

Utilities

XMMO
5.7%
DGRW
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

XMMO
4.6%
DGRW
7.1%

Financial Services

XMMO
2.3%
DGRW
11.3%

Communication Services

XMMO
1.4%
DGRW
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

XMMO
0.5%
DGRW
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XMMO vs. DGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRW
DGRW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XMMO vs. DGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMMODGRWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.32

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.41

2.15

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.54

9.28

+8.26

XMMO vs. DGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the DGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMMO and DGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XMMO vs. DGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMMO drawdown since its inception was -55.37%, which is greater than DGRW's maximum drawdown of -32.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMMO and DGRW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMMODGRWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.37%

-32.04%

-23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.34%

-8.30%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.93%

-16.21%

-8.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.91%

-17.27%

-10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.74%

-32.04%

-4.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-1.93%

+0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.44%

-3.01%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

1.92%

+0.17%

Volatility

XMMO vs. DGRW - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a higher volatility of 9.07% compared to WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRW) at 3.41%. This indicates that XMMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMMODGRWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.07%

3.41%

+5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.76%

8.04%

+8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

10.16%

+9.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.62%

14.01%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

16.23%

+6.12%

XMMO vs. DGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMMO has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XMMO vs. DGRW - Dividend Comparison

XMMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than DGRW's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRW
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.28%1.43%1.55%1.74%2.15%1.78%1.93%2.20%2.42%1.71%2.13%2.18%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.61%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


XMMO and DGRW have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XMMO has higher volatility (9.07%) compared to DGRW (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMMO dropped -55.37% vs DGRW's -32.04%.

On 10-year performance, XMMO leads with 19.95% vs 14.13% for DGRW. On fees, DGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DGRW has been the lower-risk option at 3.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMMO has performed better with a 19.95% return vs 14.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.

DGRW has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.61% for XMMO.

XMMO is categorized as Momentum, while DGRW is Dividend. XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index, while DGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XMMO and 0.28% for DGRW.

XMMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XMMO and DGRW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer