XMLV vs. SIXH
XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. XMLV is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, XMLV returned 5.52%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for SIXH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XMLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
XMLV vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 2.54% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 7.20% return.
XMLV
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -2.36%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.18%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
XMLV vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.54% | 5.55% | 17.08% | 1.86% | -6.55% | 23.00% | 17.45% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLV and SIXH is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XMLV and SIXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
XMLV vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XMLV
SIXH
Real Estate
Financial Services
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Real Estate
XMLV
SIXH
Financial Services
XMLV
SIXH
Utilities
XMLV
SIXH
Industrials
XMLV
SIXH
Consumer Defensive
XMLV
SIXH
Energy
XMLV
SIXH
Consumer Cyclical
XMLV
SIXH
Healthcare
XMLV
SIXH
Basic Materials
XMLV
SIXH
Communication Services
XMLV
SIXH
Technology
XMLV
SIXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLV vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
XMLV
SIXH
XMLV vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.25 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 2.44 | -1.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.66 | 6.25 | -3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 1.40 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.87 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.05 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
XMLV vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.86% | -11.68% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -4.36% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -9.10% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -11.68% | -4.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.89% | -2.42% | -2.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -1.85% | -2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | 1.70% | +0.39% |
Volatility
XMLV vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLV | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.31% | +0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 6.02% | +1.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.35% | 7.60% | +2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 10.37% | +4.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 10.15% | +6.82% |
XMLV vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
XMLV vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than SIXH's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.91% | 2.87% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 1.14% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 1.74% | 1.72% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLV and SIXH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMLV has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 5.52% for XMLV. On fees, XMLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMLV and 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMLV and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer