XMLV vs. OMFL
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL).
XMLV and OMFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XMLV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index. It was launched on Feb 15, 2013. OMFL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 OFI Dynamic Multifactor Index. It was launched on Nov 8, 2017. Both XMLV and OMFL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XMLV or OMFL.
Key characteristics
| XMLV | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.25% | 2.43% |
| 1Y Return | 21.26% | 12.38% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 6.54% | 4.93% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 5.07% | 12.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.68 | 0.84 |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.76% | 14.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -39.86% | -33.24% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -5.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLV and OMFL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XMLV vs. OMFL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly higher than OMFL's 2.43% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XMLV vs. OMFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than OMFL's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XMLV vs. OMFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XMLV vs. OMFL - Dividend Comparison
XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than OMFL's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 1.45% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 1.14% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 1.74% | 1.72% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 1.63% |
OMFL Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.55% | 0.95% | 1.48% | 1.53% | 1.39% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XMLV vs. OMFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than OMFL's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and OMFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XMLV vs. OMFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) is 3.11%, while Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that XMLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.