XMLV vs. SPLV
XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMLV returned 8.07%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for SPLV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
XMLV vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 12.22% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 8.10% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XMLV having a 8.07% annualized return and SPLV not far ahead at 8.28%.
XMLV
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- 6M
- 9.48%
- YTD
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- 16.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.03%
SPLV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 4.74%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 9.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $164.48M | $163.53M | $188.20M | |
| $1.62M | $1.47M | $1.28M |
XMLV vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 12.22% | 5.55% | 17.08% | 1.86% | -6.55% | 23.00% | -8.42% | 23.77% | -0.16% | 13.72% |
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 8.10% | 4.10% | 13.93% | 0.53% | -4.88% | 24.13% | -1.39% | 27.87% | -0.19% | 17.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between XMLV and SPLV is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013 | 0.83 |
The correlation between XMLV and SPLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XMLV vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank
XMLV
SPLV
XMLV vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XMLV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.34 | 1.04 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.75 | 2.38 | +5.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XMLV vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, which is greater than SPLV's maximum drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and SPLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XMLV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.86% | -36.26% | -3.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.03% | -7.41% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.80% | -9.10% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.53% | -17.26% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.86% | -36.26% | -3.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -2.26% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -3.54% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.23% | -1.11% |
Volatility
XMLV vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) have volatilities of 3.81% and 3.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XMLV | SPLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 3.93% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.32% | 8.27% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.85% | 10.72% | +0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.61% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 15.42% | +1.56% |
XMLV vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XMLV and SPLV have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XMLV vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison
XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than SPLV's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | 2.12% | 2.04% | 1.88% | 2.45% | 2.11% | 1.51% | 2.12% | 2.08% | 2.18% | 2.03% | 2.03% | 2.28% |
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | 2.83% | 2.87% | 2.23% | 2.34% | 2.05% | 1.14% | 1.93% | 2.02% | 2.13% | 1.74% | 1.72% | 1.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XMLV and SPLV have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPLV has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to XMLV (3.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs SPLV's -36.26%.
On 10-year performance, SPLV leads with 8.28% vs 8.07% for XMLV. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, XMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPLV has performed better with a 8.28% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMLV and SPLV have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.12% for SPLV.
XMLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while SPLV is S&P 500. XMLV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index.
XMLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XMLV and SPLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer