XMLV vs. RSP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

XMLV (Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XMLV is a Low Volatility fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while RSP is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XMLV returned 8.01%/yr vs 11.94%/yr for RSP. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XMLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for RSP.

Performance

XMLV vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XMLV achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than RSP's 13.16% return. Over the past 10 years, XMLV has underperformed RSP with an annualized return of 8.01%, while RSP has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.

XMLV

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.77%
• 6M: 8.77%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 1Y: 15.65%
• 3Y*: 11.57%
• 5Y*: 7.14%
• 10Y*: 8.01%
• ALL TIME*: 9.98%

RSP

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 9.43%
• YTD: 13.16%
• 1Y: 20.39%
• 3Y*: 13.55%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 11.94%
• ALL TIME*: 11.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	$1.86B	$1.85B	$2.06B
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	$1.62M	$1.47M	$1.28M

XMLV vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	11.48%	5.55%	17.08%	1.86%	-6.55%	23.00%	-8.42%	23.77%	-0.16%	13.72%
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	13.16%	11.21%	12.79%	13.70%	-11.62%	29.41%	12.66%	28.91%	-7.84%	18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XMLV and RSP is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2013	0.83

The correlation between XMLV and RSP shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XMLV vs. RSP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XMLV	RSP
Real Estate	32.8%	6.0%
Financial Services	26.0%	14.8%
Utilities	17.8%	6.6%
Industrials	10.0%	14.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.4%	9.5%
Energy	3.7%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	6.2%
Healthcare	2.0%	11.8%
Basic Materials	1.0%	4.6%
Communication Services	1.0%	3.3%
Technology	1.0%	16.9%

Return for Risk

XMLV vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XMLV

XMLV Risk / Return Rank: 61
XMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
XMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
XMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
XMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 61

RSP

RSP Risk / Return Rank: 73
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 69
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XMLV vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XMLV	RSP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	1.63	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	2.38	-0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.29	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.43	-0.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.26	9.43	-2.17

XMLV vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XMLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XMLV and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XMLV vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XMLV drawdown since its inception was -39.86%, smaller than the maximum RSP drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XMLV and RSP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XMLV	RSP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.86%	-59.92%	+20.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.03%	-7.85%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.80%	-17.81%	+4.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.53%	-21.38%	+4.85%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.86%	-39.04%	-0.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-1.23%	-0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.22%	-6.61%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.12%	2.02%	+0.10%

Volatility

XMLV vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF (XMLV) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 2.88%. This indicates that XMLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XMLV	RSP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	2.88%	+0.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.30%	8.59%	-0.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.82%	11.76%	-0.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.50%	16.16%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	18.28%	-1.31%

XMLV vs. RSP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XMLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than RSP's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XMLV vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

XMLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than RSP's 1.49% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF	1.49%	1.64%	1.52%	1.64%	1.82%	1.28%	1.64%	1.69%	2.02%	1.52%	1.20%	1.70%
XMLV Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF	2.85%	2.87%	2.23%	2.34%	2.05%	1.14%	1.93%	2.02%	2.13%	1.74%	1.72%	1.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XMLV and RSP in my portfolio?

XMLV and RSP have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XMLV or RSP?

XMLV has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to RSP (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XMLV dropped -39.86% vs RSP's -59.92%.

Which ETF is better, XMLV or RSP?

On 10-year performance, RSP leads with 11.94% vs 8.01% for XMLV. On fees, RSP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, RSP has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XMLV or RSP?

Over the 10-year period, RSP has performed better with a 11.94% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XMLV or RSP?

RSP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XMLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XMLV or RSP?

XMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.49% for RSP.

What is the main difference between XMLV and RSP?

XMLV is categorized as Low Volatility, while RSP is S&P 500. XMLV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Low Volatility Index, while RSP tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for XMLV and 0.20% for RSP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.