XME vs. SPYM
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XME returned 18.97%/yr vs 15.78%/yr for SPYM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XME vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 11.35% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 9.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 18.97%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively lower 15.78% annualized return.
XME
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 11.35%
- 6M
- 7.66%
- 1Y
- 76.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.03%
- 5Y*
- 23.02%
- 10Y*
- 18.97%
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
XME vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 11.35% | 83.47% | -4.54% | 21.51% | 13.13% | 34.92% | 15.95% | 14.69% | -26.78% | 21.17% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 9.79% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -4.78% | 21.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and SPYM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.57 |
The correlation between XME and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
XME vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XME
SPYM
Basic Materials
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XME
SPYM
Energy
XME
SPYM
Technology
XME
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XME
SPYM
Industrials
XME
SPYM
Communication Services
XME
-
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XME
-
SPYM
Financial Services
XME
-
SPYM
Healthcare
XME
-
SPYM
Real Estate
XME
-
SPYM
Utilities
XME
-
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XME
SPYM
XME vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XME | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.41 | 3.02 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.38 | 13.57 | -5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XME vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -54.46% | -31.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | -8.90% | -13.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | -18.72% | -11.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | -24.48% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | -33.87% | -27.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.20% | -1.73% | -11.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.06% | -7.14% | -36.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 1.98% | +7.21% |
Volatility
XME vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 13.87% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.61%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.87% | 4.61% | +9.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.09% | 9.74% | +18.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.21% | 12.39% | +23.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.72% | 16.89% | +15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 18.05% | +14.88% |
XME vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than SPYM's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.28% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and SPYM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XME has higher volatility (13.87%) compared to SPYM (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 10-year performance, XME leads with 18.97% vs 15.78% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 18.97% return vs 15.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XME.
SPYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.40% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while SPYM is S&P 500. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XME and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer