XME vs. METL
XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while METL is a Commodity Producers Equities fund actively managed by Sprott. XME is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.
Performance
XME vs. METL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 24.24% return, which is significantly higher than METL's 17.82% return.
XME
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- 24.24%
- 6M
- 27.86%
- 1Y
- 101.48%
- 3Y*
- 40.70%
- 5Y*
- 23.61%
- 10Y*
- 19.99%
METL
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- YTD
- 17.82%
- 6M
- 23.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XME vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 24.24% | 22.35% |
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 17.82% | 27.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between XME and METL is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XME vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank
XME
METL
XME vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XME | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.48 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XME | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 1.69 | -1.51 |
Drawdowns
XME vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -27.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and METL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XME | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -27.39% | -58.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -10.67% | +7.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.14% | -8.13% | -36.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | — | — |
Volatility
XME vs. METL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XME | METL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.36% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.73% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.61% | 43.83% | -9.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.54% | 43.83% | -11.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.84% | 43.83% | -10.99% |
XME vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
XME vs. METL - Dividend Comparison
XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than METL's 0.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF | 0.84% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF | 0.30% | 0.38% | 0.65% | 1.00% | 1.64% | 0.70% | 0.99% | 2.43% | 2.23% | 1.15% | 1.02% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XME and METL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.
METL has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.30% for XME.
XME is categorized as Materials, while METL is Commodity Producers Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.89% for METL.
Find the right allocation for XME and METL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer