PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XME vs. IDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XME vs. IDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than IDV's 11.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XME has outperformed IDV with an annualized return of 15.15%, while IDV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.14% annualized return.


XME

1D
-0.62%
1M
-16.42%
6M
-21.16%
YTD
-5.54%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
19.38%
10Y*
15.15%
ALL TIME*
5.32%

IDV

1D
-0.74%
1M
1.31%
6M
8.84%
YTD
11.48%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
10.14%
ALL TIME*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. IDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
-5.54%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
11.48%52.16%4.00%10.32%-6.40%12.00%-5.94%23.56%-10.37%19.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and IDV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2007

0.63

The correlation between XME and IDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XME vs. IDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XME
IDV

Basic Materials

74.8%
5.7%

Energy

24.0%
13.9%

Technology

2.2%
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
7.6%

Industrials

0.4%
6.4%

Communication Services

-

9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.6%

Financial Services

-

33.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Utilities

-

12.1%

Basic Materials

XME
74.8%
IDV
5.7%

Energy

XME
24.0%
IDV
13.9%

Technology

XME
2.2%
IDV
0.8%

Consumer Defensive

XME
0.7%
IDV
7.6%

Industrials

XME
0.4%
IDV
6.4%

Communication Services

XME

-

IDV
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XME

-

IDV
8.6%

Financial Services

XME

-

IDV
33.3%

Healthcare

XME

-

IDV

-

Real Estate

XME

-

IDV
2.0%

Utilities

XME

-

IDV
12.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XME vs. IDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

IDV
IDV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. IDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XMEIDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.40

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.47

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.79

10.74

-7.95

XME vs. IDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and IDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XME vs. IDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than IDV's maximum drawdown of -70.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and IDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XMEIDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.89%

-70.14%

-15.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.37%

-8.52%

-17.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.47%

-11.86%

-18.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.27%

-29.19%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.69%

-42.50%

-19.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.37%

-3.52%

-22.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.97%

-15.33%

-28.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.94%

2.75%

+8.19%

Volatility

XME vs. IDV - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 8.26% compared to iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) at 3.29%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XMEIDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.26%

3.29%

+4.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.01%

11.19%

+16.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.42%

13.24%

+23.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.67%

15.53%

+17.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.86%

17.61%

+15.25%

XME vs. IDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IDV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XME vs. IDV - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than IDV's 5.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDV
iShares International Select Dividend ETF
5.33%4.94%6.46%6.51%7.33%5.78%5.47%5.15%5.93%4.52%4.69%5.08%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.38%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


XME and IDV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (8.26%) compared to IDV (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs IDV's -70.14%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 15.15% vs 10.14% for IDV. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 15.15% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 5.33%, compared with 0.38% for XME.

XME is categorized as Materials, while IDV is Global Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.49% for IDV.

IDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XME and IDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer