XME vs. ESPO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) and ESPO (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while ESPO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XME returned 21.78%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for ESPO. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XME charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESPO.

Performance

XME vs. ESPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XME achieves a 16.32% return, which is significantly higher than ESPO's -15.10% return.

XME

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: 16.32%
• 6M: 18.13%
• 1Y: 86.41%
• 3Y*: 35.23%
• 5Y*: 21.78%
• 10Y*: 19.60%

ESPO

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: -3.31%
• YTD: -15.10%
• 6M: -16.17%
• 1Y: -14.92%
• 3Y*: 16.96%
• 5Y*: 5.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XME vs. ESPO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	16.32%	83.47%	-4.54%	21.51%	13.13%	34.92%	15.95%	14.69%	-20.92%
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	-15.10%	25.79%	47.61%	33.64%	-34.71%	-2.13%	83.93%	42.36%	-12.49%

Correlation

The correlation between XME and ESPO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018	0.45

XME vs. ESPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XME	ESPO
Basic Materials	75.3%	-
Energy	23.4%	-
Technology	2.2%	8.2%
Consumer Defensive	0.8%	-
Industrials	0.4%	-
Communication Services	-	78.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.8%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XME vs. ESPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XME

XME Risk / Return Rank: 75
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 73
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 61

ESPO

ESPO Risk / Return Rank: 4
ESPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
ESPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
ESPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ESPO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XME vs. ESPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XME	ESPO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	-0.80	+3.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	-1.02	+3.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	0.88	+0.49
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	-0.54	+4.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.58	-0.94	+10.52

XME vs. ESPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XME Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the ESPO Sharpe Ratio of -0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XME and ESPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XME vs. ESPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XME drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than ESPO's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XME and ESPO.

Drawdown Indicators

	XME	ESPO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.89%	-50.99%	-34.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.60%	-27.81%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.47%	-27.81%	-2.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.27%	-48.33%	+11.06%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.69%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.33%	-27.19%	+17.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.09%	-15.06%	-29.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.05%	15.95%	-6.90%

Volatility

XME vs. ESPO - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a higher volatility of 15.26% compared to VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF (ESPO) at 4.42%. This indicates that XME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XME	ESPO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.26%	4.42%	+10.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.51%	14.67%	+13.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.11%	18.83%	+17.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.84%	25.10%	+7.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.96%	25.71%	+7.25%

XME vs. ESPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XME has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPO's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

XME vs. ESPO - Dividend Comparison

XME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than ESPO's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESPO VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports ETF	1.47%	1.24%	0.44%	0.96%	0.91%	3.36%	0.12%	0.22%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XME SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF	0.32%	0.38%	0.65%	1.00%	1.64%	0.70%	0.99%	2.43%	2.23%	1.15%	1.02%	2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XME and ESPO in my portfolio?

XME and ESPO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XME or ESPO?

XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to ESPO (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XME dropped -85.89% vs ESPO's -50.99%.

Which ETF is better, XME or ESPO?

On 5-year performance, XME leads with 21.78% vs 5.49% for ESPO. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ESPO has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XME or ESPO?

Over the 5-year period, XME has performed better with a 21.78% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XME or ESPO?

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESPO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XME or ESPO?

ESPO has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

What is the main difference between XME and ESPO?

XME is categorized as Materials, while ESPO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index, while ESPO tracks MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XME and 0.55% for ESPO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.