XLYI vs. QQA
XLYI (State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLYI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for QQA.
Performance
XLYI vs. QQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLYI achieves a -5.92% return, which is significantly lower than QQA's 9.49% return.
XLYI
- 1D
- -4.19%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- 6M
- -8.52%
- YTD
- -5.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QQA
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -2.54%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 9.49%
- 1Y
- 19.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.42M | $7.06M | $6.85M | |
| $64.69K | $56.45K | $58.59K |
XLYI vs. QQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -5.92% | 5.63% |
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 9.49% | 8.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLYI and QQA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.71 |
XLYI vs. QQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLYI
QQA
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLYI
QQA
Consumer Cyclical
XLYI
QQA
Technology
XLYI
QQA
Basic Materials
XLYI
-
QQA
Communication Services
XLYI
-
QQA
Consumer Defensive
XLYI
-
QQA
Energy
XLYI
-
QQA
Healthcare
XLYI
-
QQA
Industrials
XLYI
-
QQA
Real Estate
XLYI
-
QQA
Utilities
XLYI
-
QQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLYI vs. QQA — Risk / Return Rank
XLYI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQA
XLYI vs. QQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLYI) and Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLYI | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.24 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.04 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLYI vs. QQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLYI drawdown since its inception was -12.32%, smaller than the maximum QQA drawdown of -19.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLYI and QQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLYI | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -19.73% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | -4.63% | -4.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -2.52% | -0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.18% | — |
Volatility
XLYI vs. QQA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLYI | QQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.48% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 14.81% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 18.60% | -2.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.12% | 18.60% | -2.48% |
XLYI vs. QQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLYI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQA's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLYI vs. QQA - Dividend Comparison
XLYI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.68%, more than QQA's 10.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF | 10.11% | 9.78% | 4.29% |
XLYI State Street Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 15.68% | 6.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLYI and QQA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLYI.
XLYI has the higher dividend yield at 15.68%, compared with 10.11% for QQA.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLYI and 0.29% for QQA.
Find the right allocation for XLYI and QQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer