XLY vs. XLV
XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) and XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XLV is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLY returned 12.06%/yr vs 9.71%/yr for XLV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLY charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLV.
Performance
XLY vs. XLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's 4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, XLY has outperformed XLV with an annualized return of 12.06%, while XLV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.71% annualized return.
XLY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -3.18%
- YTD
- -3.42%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 11.25%
- 5Y*
- 5.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.55%
XLV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- 6M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 24.38%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.58%
XLY vs. XLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -3.42% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 4.40% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLY and XLV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLY and XLV has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLY vs. XLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLY
XLV
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLY
XLV
-
Communication Services
XLY
XLV
-
Technology
XLY
XLV
-
Industrials
XLY
XLV
-
Basic Materials
XLY
-
XLV
-
Consumer Defensive
XLY
-
XLV
-
Energy
XLY
-
XLV
-
Financial Services
XLY
-
XLV
-
Healthcare
XLY
-
XLV
Real Estate
XLY
-
XLV
-
Utilities
XLY
-
XLV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLY vs. XLV — Risk / Return Rank
XLY
XLV
XLY vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.27 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 2.34 | -2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.71 | 5.52 | -4.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLY vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than XLV's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and XLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.05% | -39.17% | -19.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.98% | -10.47% | -4.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.01% | -17.11% | -8.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.67% | -17.11% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.67% | -28.40% | -11.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.38% | -2.55% | -4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.54% | -7.10% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.27% | 4.42% | +0.85% |
Volatility
XLY vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 5.26%, while State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLY | XLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 6.24% | -0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.15% | 11.90% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.70% | 15.84% | +2.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 14.99% | +8.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.10% | 16.63% | +5.47% |
XLY vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLY vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison
XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than XLV's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.58% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.79% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLY and XLV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLV has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to XLY (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs XLV's -39.17%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.06% vs 9.71% for XLV. On fees, XLV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.
XLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.79% for XLY.
XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while XLV is Health & Biotech Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while XLV tracks Health Care Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.08% for XLV.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLY and XLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer