PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. WANT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. WANT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly higher than WANT's -13.00% return.


XLY

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
12.63%

WANT

1D
1.25%
1M
-3.67%
YTD
-13.00%
6M
-12.78%
1Y
8.75%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
-5.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. WANT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-1.60%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%-7.29%
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
-13.00%-6.94%60.52%114.43%-83.03%84.81%45.26%90.07%-24.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and WANT is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2018

1.00

The correlation between XLY and WANT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLY vs. WANT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
WANT

Consumer Cyclical

97.5%
19.4%

Communication Services

1.4%
0.3%

Technology

0.9%
0.2%

Industrials

0.1%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.5%
WANT
19.4%

Communication Services

XLY
1.4%
WANT
0.3%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
WANT
0.2%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
WANT
0.0%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

WANT

-

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

WANT

-

Energy

XLY

-

WANT

-

Financial Services

XLY

-

WANT

-

Healthcare

XLY

-

WANT

-

Real Estate

XLY

-

WANT

-

Utilities

XLY

-

WANT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. WANT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

WANT
WANT Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
WANT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WANT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
WANT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
WANT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
WANT Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. WANT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYWANTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.07

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

0.21

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

0.58

+1.53

XLY vs. WANT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the WANT Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and WANT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYWANTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.16

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

-0.07

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.12

+0.31

Drawdowns

XLY vs. WANT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, smaller than the maximum WANT drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and WANT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYWANTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-85.89%

+26.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-41.27%

+26.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-63.53%

+37.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-85.89%

+46.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-58.07%

+52.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-43.08%

+33.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

15.17%

-10.41%

Volatility

XLY vs. WANT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) is 5.17%, while Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a volatility of 15.47%. This indicates that XLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WANT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYWANTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

15.47%

-10.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

38.88%

-25.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

53.92%

-35.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

70.64%

-46.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

71.48%

-49.43%

XLY vs. WANT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than WANT's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLY vs. WANT - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than WANT's 0.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WANT
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares
0.62%0.65%0.61%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.07%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.76%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, XLY and WANT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

WANT has higher volatility (15.47%) compared to XLY (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs WANT's -85.89%.

On 5-year performance, XLY leads with 7.39% vs -5.12% for WANT. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 5.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLY has performed better with a 7.39% return vs -5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.62% for WANT.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while WANT is Leveraged Equities. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.98% for WANT.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and WANT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer