WANT vs. SCHD
WANT (Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WANT is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, WANT returned -9.24%/yr vs 9.00%/yr for SCHD. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WANT charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
WANT vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WANT achieves a -17.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 20.66% return.
WANT
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -26.49%
- YTD
- -17.23%
- 1Y
- -3.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.15%
- 5Y*
- -9.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- 6M
- 16.13%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 1Y
- 23.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
WANT vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | -17.23% | -6.94% | 60.52% | 114.43% | -83.03% | 84.81% | 45.26% | 90.07% | -24.44% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -7.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between WANT and SCHD is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2018 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between WANT and SCHD has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
WANT vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WANT
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
WANT
SCHD
Technology
WANT
SCHD
Communication Services
WANT
SCHD
Industrials
WANT
SCHD
Basic Materials
WANT
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
WANT
-
SCHD
Energy
WANT
-
SCHD
Financial Services
WANT
-
SCHD
Healthcare
WANT
-
SCHD
Real Estate
WANT
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
WANT
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WANT vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
WANT
SCHD
WANT vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WANT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.38 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.09 | 5.12 | -5.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | 12.47 | -12.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WANT vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WANT drawdown since its inception was -85.89%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WANT and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WANT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.89% | -33.37% | -52.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.27% | -4.61% | -36.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.53% | -16.13% | -47.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -85.89% | -16.85% | -69.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.11% | -0.03% | -60.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.27% | -3.31% | -39.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.14% | 1.89% | +15.25% |
Volatility
WANT vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares (WANT) has a higher volatility of 18.52% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.54%. This indicates that WANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WANT | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.52% | 3.54% | +14.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.83% | 7.70% | +34.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.31% | 10.93% | +44.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.13% | 14.36% | +56.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.37% | 16.70% | +54.67% |
WANT vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
WANT has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
WANT vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
WANT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
WANT Direxion Daily Consumer Discretionary Bull 3X Shares | 0.53% | 0.65% | 0.61% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WANT and SCHD have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WANT has higher volatility (18.52%) compared to SCHD (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WANT dropped -85.89% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 9.00% vs -9.24% for WANT. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 9.00% return vs -9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for WANT.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.53% for WANT.
WANT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. WANT tracks S&P Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index (-300%), while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for WANT and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WANT and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer