PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.71% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLY having a 12.57% annualized return and SCHD not far ahead at 12.65%.


XLY

1D
0.46%
1M
-4.00%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.81%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
12.57%

SCHD

1D
-0.03%
1M
2.12%
YTD
18.71%
6M
19.28%
1Y
26.37%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
12.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-3.17%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.71%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XLY and SCHD is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between XLY and SCHD has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLY vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLY
SCHD

Consumer Cyclical

97.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

1.3%
6.3%

Technology

0.9%
16.4%

Industrials

0.1%
7.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

19.2%

Energy

-

16.2%

Financial Services

-

9.3%

Healthcare

-

18.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLY
97.6%
SCHD
6.3%

Communication Services

XLY
1.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Technology

XLY
0.9%
SCHD
16.4%

Industrials

XLY
0.1%
SCHD
7.5%

Basic Materials

XLY

-

SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

XLY

-

SCHD
19.2%

Energy

XLY

-

SCHD
16.2%

Financial Services

XLY

-

SCHD
9.3%

Healthcare

XLY

-

SCHD
18.8%

Real Estate

XLY

-

SCHD

-

Utilities

XLY

-

SCHD
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.43

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

5.74

-5.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.01

14.06

-12.05

XLY vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLY and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

2.43

-1.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.59

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.76

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.86

-0.44

Drawdowns

XLY vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-33.37%

-25.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

-4.61%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

-16.13%

-9.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

-16.85%

-22.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

-33.37%

-6.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.15%

-1.64%

-5.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-3.32%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.80%

1.88%

+2.92%

Volatility

XLY vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a higher volatility of 5.32% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.83%. This indicates that XLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

2.83%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

7.60%

+5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

10.94%

+7.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.80%

14.38%

+9.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

16.72%

+5.34%

XLY vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLY vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than SCHD's 3.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.27%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.77%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLY and SCHD have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLY has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to SCHD (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLY dropped -59.05% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.65% vs 12.57% for XLY. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.65% return vs 12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLY.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 0.77% for XLY.

XLY is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer