PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLY vs. GXPD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLY vs. GXPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLY achieves a -1.60% return, which is significantly lower than GXPD's -0.76% return.


XLY

1D
0.45%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
-1.60%
6M
-1.13%
1Y
10.01%
3Y*
15.13%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
12.63%

GXPD

1D
0.11%
1M
-2.31%
YTD
-0.76%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLY vs. GXPD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLY and GXPD is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.97

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLY vs. GXPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPD
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLY vs. GXPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLYGXPDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

XLY vs. GXPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLYGXPDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.27

+0.16

Drawdowns

XLY vs. GXPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLY drawdown since its inception was -59.05%, which is greater than GXPD's maximum drawdown of -16.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLY and GXPD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLYGXPDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.05%

-16.61%

-42.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.64%

-5.37%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-4.27%

-5.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.76%

Volatility

XLY vs. GXPD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLYGXPDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.16%

19.96%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.78%

19.96%

+3.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.05%

19.96%

+2.09%

XLY vs. GXPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLY has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPD's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLY vs. GXPD - Dividend Comparison

XLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than GXPD's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GXPD
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.76%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XLY and GXPD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for GXPD.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.

XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index, while GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLY and 0.15% for GXPD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLY and GXPD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer