TMED vs. FTXH
TMED (T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF) and FTXH (First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. At a correlation of -0.46, they often move in opposite directions. TMED charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FTXH.
Performance
TMED vs. FTXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMED
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FTXH
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 10.44%
- 6M
- 9.18%
- 1Y
- 44.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- —
TMED vs. FTXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | -7.14% |
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 5.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMED and FTXH is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2026 | -0.46 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMED vs. FTXH — Risk / Return Rank
TMED
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FTXH
TMED vs. FTXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF (TMED) and First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF (FTXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMED | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.44 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.65 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMED vs. FTXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMED drawdown since its inception was -7.14%, smaller than the maximum FTXH drawdown of -32.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMED and FTXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMED | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.14% | -32.11% | +24.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | 0.00% | -7.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -5.81% | +0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility
TMED vs. FTXH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMED | FTXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.04% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.28% | 17.18% | +49.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.28% | 16.37% | +49.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.28% | 18.42% | +47.86% |
TMED vs. FTXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMED has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FTXH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMED vs. FTXH - Dividend Comparison
TMED has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXH First Trust Nasdaq Pharmaceuticals ETF | 1.16% | 1.41% | 1.66% | 1.55% | 1.11% | 1.03% | 0.82% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 2.18% | 0.19% |
TMED T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMED and FTXH have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMED is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMED is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXH.
FTXH has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.00% for TMED.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TMED and 0.60% for FTXH.
Find the right allocation for TMED and FTXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer