XLVI vs. PINK
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and PINK (Simplify Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLVI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while PINK is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PINK.
Performance
XLVI vs. PINK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than PINK's 4.23% return.
XLVI
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PINK
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- 3.34%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 13.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI vs. PINK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 2.99% | 12.41% |
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 4.23% | 23.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and PINK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.67 |
XLVI vs. PINK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLVI
PINK
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLVI
PINK
Healthcare
XLVI
PINK
Basic Materials
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Communication Services
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Consumer Defensive
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Energy
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Industrials
XLVI
-
PINK
Real Estate
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Technology
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Utilities
XLVI
-
PINK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. PINK — Risk / Return Rank
XLVI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PINK
XLVI vs. PINK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLVI | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.95 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. PINK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum PINK drawdown of -18.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and PINK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -18.77% | +10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -1.10% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.94% | -6.70% | +4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.62% | — |
Volatility
XLVI vs. PINK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | PINK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.58% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.05% | 18.54% | -7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 17.59% | -6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 17.59% | -6.54% |
XLVI vs. PINK - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PINK's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. PINK - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, more than PINK's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PINK Simplify Health Care ETF | 0.66% | 0.68% | 0.32% | 0.94% | 0.42% | 0.04% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.12% | 5.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and PINK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PINK.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.12%, compared with 0.66% for PINK.
XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while PINK is Health & Biotech Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.50% for PINK.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and PINK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer