PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PINK vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PINK vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PINK achieves a 2.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.


PINK

1D
1.24%
1M
7.28%
YTD
2.39%
6M
2.11%
1Y
31.27%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
10Y*

SPMO

1D
0.50%
1M
15.36%
YTD
30.35%
6M
30.51%
1Y
46.00%
3Y*
43.04%
5Y*
24.29%
10Y*
20.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PINK vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
2.39%24.34%8.81%3.80%-4.41%12.20%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
30.35%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%4.87%

Correlation

The correlation between PINK and SPMO is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2021

0.58

The correlation between PINK and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PINK vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PINK
SPMO

Healthcare

93.1%
6.7%

Industrials

6.9%
11.3%

Financial Services

0.0%
5.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.6%

Communication Services

-

9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.3%

Energy

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

52.6%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Healthcare

PINK
93.1%
SPMO
6.7%

Industrials

PINK
6.9%
SPMO
11.3%

Financial Services

PINK
0.0%
SPMO
5.9%

Basic Materials

PINK

-

SPMO
1.6%

Communication Services

PINK

-

SPMO
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PINK

-

SPMO
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

PINK

-

SPMO
4.3%

Energy

PINK

-

SPMO
3.4%

Real Estate

PINK

-

SPMO
1.0%

Technology

PINK

-

SPMO
52.6%

Utilities

PINK

-

SPMO
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PINK vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PINK
PINK Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
PINK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINK Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PINK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PINK vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PINKSPMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

2.62

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.50

3.54

-1.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

3.64

-1.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.62

14.17

-8.54

PINK vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PINK Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is lower than the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PINK and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PINKSPMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.62

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

1.01

-0.45

Drawdowns

PINK vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PINK drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PINK and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PINKSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-30.95%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.81%

-12.70%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.77%

-20.13%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

0.00%

-2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.75%

-4.60%

-2.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.57%

3.26%

+2.31%

Volatility

PINK vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Simplify Health Care ETF (PINK) is 4.36%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that PINK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PINKSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

7.35%

-2.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.44%

14.39%

-0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

17.64%

+0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

19.30%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.57%

20.31%

-2.74%

PINK vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PINK has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PINK vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

PINK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, more than SPMO's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PINK
Simplify Health Care ETF
0.67%0.68%0.32%0.94%0.42%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.65%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


PINK and SPMO have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to PINK (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PINK dropped -18.77% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 3-year performance, SPMO leads with 43.04% vs 14.42% for PINK. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, PINK has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 43.04% return vs 14.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for PINK.

PINK has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.65% for SPMO.

PINK is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Simplify and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PINK and 0.13% for SPMO.

SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PINK and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer