FXH vs. IHF
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF).
FXH and IHF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FXH is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the StrataQuant Health Care Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. IHF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Health Care Providers Index. It was launched on May 5, 2006. Both FXH and IHF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FXH or IHF.
Key characteristics
| FXH | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.57% | 4.82% |
| 1Y Return | 23.73% | 12.25% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -2.19% | 0.00% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.50% | 9.10% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.83% | 10.39% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.64 | 0.74 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.33 | 1.11 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.28 | 1.15 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.73 | 0.70 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.13 | 2.87 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.96% | 3.78% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.84% | 14.58% |
| Max Drawdown | -43.70% | -58.82% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.85% | -6.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between FXH and IHF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FXH vs. IHF - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than IHF's 4.82% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has underperformed IHF with an annualized return of 6.83%, while IHF has yielded a comparatively higher 10.39% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FXH vs. IHF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than IHF's 0.43% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FXH vs. IHF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FXH vs. IHF - Dividend Comparison
FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than IHF's 0.74% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXH First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund | 0.42% | 0.24% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
IHF iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF | 0.74% | 0.79% | 1.27% | 0.56% | 0.53% | 0.58% | 4.01% | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.20% | 0.18% | 0.23% |
Drawdowns
FXH vs. IHF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, smaller than the maximum IHF drawdown of -58.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and IHF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FXH vs. IHF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) is 3.58%, while iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF (IHF) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that FXH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.