PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FXH vs. VHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FXH vs. VHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FXH achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -4.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FXH has underperformed VHT with an annualized return of 6.87%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.


FXH

1D
-1.56%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
-2.45%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
3.01%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
6.87%

VHT

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.62%
YTD
-4.81%
6M
-4.41%
1Y
13.73%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
4.42%
10Y*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FXH vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
-0.78%10.16%0.96%-4.53%-12.24%15.20%28.00%22.26%-1.33%21.82%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
-4.81%15.46%2.66%2.52%-5.60%20.57%18.29%21.87%5.58%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FXH and VHT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2007

0.89

The correlation between FXH and VHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

FXH vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FXH
VHT

Healthcare

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

FXH
100.0%
VHT
100.0%

Basic Materials

FXH

-

VHT

-

Communication Services

FXH

-

VHT

-

Consumer Cyclical

FXH

-

VHT

-

Consumer Defensive

FXH

-

VHT

-

Energy

FXH

-

VHT

-

Financial Services

FXH

-

VHT
0.0%

Industrials

FXH

-

VHT
0.0%

Real Estate

FXH

-

VHT

-

Technology

FXH

-

VHT
0.0%

Utilities

FXH

-

VHT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FXH vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FXH
FXH Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
FXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXH Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXH Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VHT
VHT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FXH vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FXHVHTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.78

0.96

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.51

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.17

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

1.34

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.98

3.39

-0.42

FXH vs. VHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FXH Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the VHT Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FXH and VHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FXHVHTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.96

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.30

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.54

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.56

-0.05

Drawdowns

FXH vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FXH drawdown since its inception was -43.70%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FXH and VHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FXHVHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.70%

-39.12%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.20%

-10.40%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.53%

-16.91%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.49%

-17.71%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.61%

-28.85%

-1.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.40%

-7.83%

-2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.46%

-5.99%

-3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.99%

4.12%

-0.13%

Volatility

FXH vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund (FXH) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) have volatilities of 3.89% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FXHVHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

4.00%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

10.14%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.69%

14.32%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

14.96%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.47%

16.94%

+1.53%

FXH vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FXH has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FXH vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison

FXH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, less than VHT's 1.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FXH
First Trust Health Care AlphaDEX Fund
0.86%0.75%0.41%0.24%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VHT
Vanguard Health Care ETF
1.72%1.61%1.53%1.36%1.33%1.14%1.21%1.89%1.38%1.31%1.45%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


FXH and VHT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHT has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to FXH (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FXH dropped -43.70% vs VHT's -39.12%.

On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 9.17% vs 6.87% for FXH. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, FXH has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 9.17% return vs 6.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VHT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for FXH.

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.86% for FXH.

FXH tracks StrataQuant Health Care Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for FXH and 0.10% for VHT.

VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FXH and VHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer