PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLVI vs. CSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLVI vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLVI achieves a -0.67% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.63% return.


XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSHP

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.63%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLVI vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLVI and CSHP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

-0.02

XLVI vs. CSHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLVI
CSHP

Financial Services

100.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLVI
100.6%
CSHP
0.1%

Basic Materials

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Communication Services

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Consumer Defensive

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Energy

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Healthcare

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Industrials

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Real Estate

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Technology

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Utilities

XLVI

-

CSHP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLVI vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLVI

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLVI vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLVI vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLVICSHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

10.75

-9.43

Drawdowns

XLVI vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and CSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLVICSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-0.08%

-8.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.02%

0.00%

-4.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.95%

-0.00%

-1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

Volatility

XLVI vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLVICSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.94%

0.33%

+10.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.94%

0.40%

+10.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.94%

0.40%

+10.54%

XLVI vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLVI vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.53%, more than CSHP's 3.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XLVI and CSHP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLVI.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 3.92% for CSHP.

XLVI is categorized as Derivative Income, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.20% for CSHP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLVI and CSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer