XLVI vs. ACYS
XLVI (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLVI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.
Performance
XLVI vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XLVI
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACYS
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLVI vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison
Correlation
The correlation between XLVI and ACYS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLVI vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLVI vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLVI drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLVI and ACYS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLVI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -0.63% | -7.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.10% | +0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -0.14% | -1.69% |
Volatility
XLVI vs. ACYS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLVI | ACYS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.06% | 3.38% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 3.38% | +7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 3.38% | +7.68% |
XLVI vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLVI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLVI vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison
XLVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.89%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF | 0.60% | 0.00% |
XLVI State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 11.89% | 5.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLVI and ACYS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ACYS.
XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.89%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.
They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLVI and 0.75% for ACYS.
Find the right allocation for XLVI and ACYS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer