XLV vs. ZBH
XLV (State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Health Care Select Sector Index, while ZBH (Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLV returned 9.81%/yr vs -1.64%/yr for ZBH. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
XLV vs. ZBH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLV achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than ZBH's -1.23% return. Over the past 10 years, XLV has outperformed ZBH with an annualized return of 9.81%, while ZBH has yielded a comparatively lower -1.64% annualized return.
XLV
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 4.90%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 15.00%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
ZBH
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- -1.23%
- 6M
- -2.78%
- 1Y
- -1.95%
- 3Y*
- -12.72%
- 5Y*
- -9.68%
- 10Y*
- -1.64%
XLV vs. ZBH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.23% | 14.50% | 2.47% | 2.07% | -2.08% | 26.04% | 13.30% | 20.45% | 6.28% | 21.77% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | -1.23% | -14.03% | -12.46% | -3.81% | 4.24% | -17.02% | 3.77% | 45.37% | -13.30% | 17.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLV and ZBH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2001 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XLV and ZBH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLV vs. ZBH — Risk / Return Rank
XLV
ZBH
XLV vs. ZBH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) and Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLV | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | -0.16 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | -0.31 | +3.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLV vs. ZBH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLV drawdown since its inception was -39.17%, smaller than the maximum ZBH drawdown of -65.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLV and ZBH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLV | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.17% | -65.03% | +25.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.47% | -25.54% | +15.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.11% | -43.94% | +26.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.11% | -48.62% | +31.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -52.14% | +23.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.59% | -46.73% | +43.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -20.08% | +12.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.37% | 13.04% | -8.67% |
Volatility
XLV vs. ZBH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLV) is 4.90%, while Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (ZBH) has a volatility of 5.90%. This indicates that XLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZBH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLV | ZBH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.90% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 20.40% | -9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 30.57% | -15.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 26.65% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 28.45% | -11.87% |
Dividends
XLV vs. ZBH - Dividend Comparison
XLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than ZBH's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLV State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.63% | 1.60% | 1.67% | 1.59% | 1.47% | 1.33% | 1.49% | 2.17% | 1.57% | 1.47% | 1.60% | 1.43% |
ZBH Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. | 1.08% | 1.07% | 0.91% | 0.79% | 0.75% | 0.76% | 0.62% | 0.64% | 0.93% | 0.80% | 0.93% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLV and ZBH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZBH has higher volatility (5.90%) compared to XLV (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLV dropped -39.17% vs ZBH's -65.03%.
XLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLV and ZBH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer