XLU vs. XLF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLU returned 9.19%/yr vs 12.51%/yr for XLF. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.08% expense ratio.

Performance

XLU vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, XLU has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 9.19%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.

XLU

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -5.69%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 9.31%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

XLF

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: -5.56%
• 6M: -1.77%
• 1Y: 2.50%
• 3Y*: 18.09%
• 5Y*: 7.91%
• 10Y*: 12.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLU vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	3.55%	16.03%	23.31%	-7.18%	1.44%	17.70%	0.51%	25.93%	3.94%	12.05%
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	-5.56%	14.90%	30.56%	12.03%	-10.59%	34.80%	-1.74%	31.88%	-13.06%	22.00%

Correlation

The correlation between XLU and XLF is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998	0.41

Over the past year, the correlation between XLU and XLF has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLU vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLU	XLF
Utilities	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	98.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	0.2%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	1.8%

Return for Risk

XLU vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLU

XLU Risk / Return Rank: 21
XLU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
XLU Omega Ratio Rank: 20
XLU Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
XLU Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XLF

XLF Risk / Return Rank: 11
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLU vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLU	XLF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.68	0.17	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.01	0.33	+0.68
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.04	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.17	+0.94
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.52	0.45	+2.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLU vs. XLF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the XLF Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLU and XLF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLU	XLF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68	0.17	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.43	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.57	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	0.20	+0.19

Drawdowns

XLU vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XLF.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLU	XLF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.98%	-82.69%	+30.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.18%	-14.79%	+5.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.26%	-15.54%	-1.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.26%	-25.81%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.07%	-42.86%	+6.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.38%	-8.29%	+0.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.22%	-20.03%	+9.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.07%	5.63%	-1.56%

Volatility

XLU vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison

State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.41% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 3.15%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLU	XLF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.41%	3.15%	+2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.76%	10.91%	+0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.56%	14.36%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	18.62%	-1.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.26%	22.16%	-2.90%

XLU vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLU and XLF have an expense ratio of 0.08%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLU vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than XLF's 1.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF	1.54%	1.31%	1.42%	1.71%	2.04%	1.63%	2.03%	1.87%	2.08%	1.48%	21.10%	1.95%
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.71%	2.71%	2.96%	3.39%	2.92%	2.79%	3.14%	2.95%	3.33%	3.33%	3.41%	3.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLU and XLF in my portfolio?

XLU and XLF have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLU or XLF?

XLU has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to XLF (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XLF's -82.69%.

Which ETF is better, XLU or XLF?

On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 12.51% vs 9.19% for XLU. Both ETFs have the same 0.08% expense ratio. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLU or XLF?

Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 9.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLU or XLF?

XLU and XLF have the same expense ratio: 0.08% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLU or XLF?

XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.54% for XLF.

What is the main difference between XLU and XLF?

XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.