XLU vs. XLC
XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLU returned 9.41%/yr vs 8.03%/yr for XLC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLU charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
XLU vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLU achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -4.85% return.
XLU
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 5.04%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- 13.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 9.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
XLU vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 5.04% | 16.03% | 23.31% | -7.18% | 1.44% | 17.70% | 0.51% | 25.93% | 8.35% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLU and XLC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.28 |
The correlation between XLU and XLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLU vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLU
XLC
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
XLU
XLC
-
Basic Materials
XLU
-
XLC
-
Communication Services
XLU
-
XLC
Consumer Cyclical
XLU
-
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
XLU
-
XLC
-
Energy
XLU
-
XLC
-
Financial Services
XLU
-
XLC
-
Healthcare
XLU
-
XLC
-
Industrials
XLU
-
XLC
-
Real Estate
XLU
-
XLC
-
Technology
XLU
-
XLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLU vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
XLU
XLC
XLU vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLU | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 0.86 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.80 | 2.73 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLU vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLU drawdown since its inception was -51.98%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLU and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLU | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.98% | -46.65% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.18% | -10.57% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.26% | -17.97% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.26% | -46.65% | +21.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -6.72% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.22% | -10.58% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.25% | 3.33% | +0.92% |
Volatility
XLU vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 3.57%. This indicates that XLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLU | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 3.57% | +2.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.68% | 9.65% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 13.28% | +1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 20.68% | -3.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 22.17% | -2.90% |
XLU vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLU has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLU vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, more than XLC's 1.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.67% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLU and XLC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLU has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLU dropped -51.98% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, XLU leads with 9.41% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLU has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.25% for XLC.
XLU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLU and 0.13% for XLC.
XLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.81 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLU and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer